My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.1. EDSR 01-31-2017
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Joint Finance Committee
>
Packets
>
2017
>
01-31-2017
>
3.1. EDSR 01-31-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2017 4:23:47 PM
Creation date
1/27/2017 4:23:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDAG
date
1/31/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
this project would be equal to approximately what the abatement revenues will be, combined <br /> city and county. If that rate is not achievable, then the abatement would be necessary. <br /> Mr. Vitzthum stated that at$5 per square foot it shows that the gap financing is necessary,if <br /> we sensitize it to $6 per square foot,it shows that gap financing wouldn't be necessary,based <br /> on the same assumptions and if the forgivable loan was not in the picture, the gap would be <br /> necessary. <br /> Ms. Huot stated that without the forgivable loan, the abatement revenues alone wouldn't be <br /> sufficient enough to support the increased mortgage. <br /> Mr. Vitzthum stated that the forgivable loan is an important factor in the viability of the <br /> project. <br /> Ms. Huot illustrated another way they look at sources and uses is to determine if the <br /> applicant increased the amount of equity,how would it impact the return to them. <br /> Ms. Huot stated that looking at the upfront sources and uses of the financing, specifically the <br /> debt and equity put into the project, can the applicant increase the amount of equity of the <br /> project, through other revenues and how would that impact the return to them. <br /> Mr. Vitzthum indicated that it really comes down to the lease rate that the current market <br /> can support. Mr. Tviete highlighted the lease revenues that at$6 the but for test isn't met, at <br /> $5 it probably is. <br /> Members reviewed local lease rates in the area based on comps in the area. <br /> Ms. Huot also stated that she looked at how else could they leverage funds, and additional <br /> equity and if they have it and if it,would it provide a reasonable return on that equity. <br /> Ms. Huot What is that threshold and is it achievable <br /> Ms. Wagner asked whether the county would support the project. Dan Weber spoke on <br /> behalf of Sherburne County,who is in support of the abatement request. <br /> Dan Weber, calculated the blended rate valued the warehouse space at$4.50 - $4.75. Office <br /> at$8.00 per foot. Come up with a blended rate of$5.25 -$5.50 a square foot. At least one of <br /> these abatements will need to be utilized to make this project work. <br /> Mr. Vitzthum asked Ms. Huot to put$5.50 into her spreadsheet to determine what happens <br /> to the viability of the project. <br /> Mr. Tviete and Ms. Wagner indicated their support the project. <br /> Ms. Wagner asked Ms. Othoudt why we scored the project"moderate" for spin off <br /> development. Ms. Othoudt stated that the moderate rating was because there are no current <br /> projects in the pipeline for that area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.