My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-27-2016 BA MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Minutes
>
2016
>
12-27-2016 BA MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2017 3:01:46 PM
Creation date
1/26/2017 3:01:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BAM
date
12/27/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustments Minutes Page 2 <br /> December 27,2016 <br /> Hauge stated she was surprised to see staffs recommendation for an 8-foot high fence,as <br /> that was not discussed and she was unsure why it was proposed. <br /> Steve Schwartz,511 Upland—stated he was a neighbor to the north of the subject <br /> property. Mr. Schwartz stated that he did not feel there was any way a driveway could be <br /> placed on 5th Street for this property. He stated that he felt a standard size house, such as a <br /> 24-ft. by 40-ft.rambler,would not present the need for a variance. He noted that there have <br /> been water issues in the area,due to a possible artesian aquifer. <br /> Mr. Carlton stated that those issues would be addressed at the time of the building permit <br /> application,as well as the amount of impervious surface. He noted that the request is not <br /> for a subdivision, since the subdivision was approved in 2005. Therefore,some of the issues <br /> raised by Ms. Kratzke would not pertain to the request at hand. <br /> There being no further public comment,Chair Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> Discussion followed regarding the setbacks and location of the access to the property on <br /> Upland Avenue or 5th Street. <br /> It was the consensus of the Commission to strike condition #2 for the 8-foot fence, since <br /> the applicant did not wish to have a fence,nor was the neighbor in favor of the fence.The <br /> Commission consensus was that the five criteria necessary for granting a variance are met. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Larson-Vito and seconded by Commissioner Feinstein to <br /> recommend approval of the request by Renae Hauge for a 15-foot front yard setback <br /> variance,based on the following criteria: <br /> 1. The general purpose and intent of front yard setbacks is to provide a <br /> uniform/controlled look to the front of structures. The general purpose and <br /> intent of rear and side yard setbacks is to keep structures reasonably separated <br /> from one another. The purpose and intent of these setbacks is in harmony with <br /> the ordinance. <br /> 2. The comprehensive plan guides this property as Residential. The proposed <br /> residential use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> 3. Building a residential home on a city approved parcel with setbacks that are more <br /> compliant then neighboring properties is using the property in a reasonable <br /> manner. <br /> 4. The plight of the property is that it received variances for lot size and lot width in <br /> 2005,prior to the applicant purchasing it. A front yard setback variance was <br /> anticipated when the property was platted. <br /> 5. The character of the locale is one of varying front yard setbacks and approving <br /> these variances will not alter that character. <br /> and with the following conditions: <br /> 1. No principal structure can be closer than 20 feet to the south property line. �. <br /> 2. The variance does not apply to accessory structures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.