My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. SR 01-25-1999
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1999
>
01/25/1999
>
6.1. SR 01-25-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:09 AM
Creation date
2/7/2005 4:25:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/25/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />adopting the 1997 uniform building code. The "delay" has to do with the <br />timing for state approval of the updated codes. <br /> <br />Consistent with city adoption of this code, for the past 10 years or so the city <br />has also been adopting the permit pricing schedule. This eliminates any <br />issue of being arbitrary when dealing with builders, and puts us on an even <br />basis with our neighboring development communities such as Ramsey, <br />Andover, Champlin, Maple Grove, etc. As noted in the building official's <br />memo, this will be the first increase in three years in the permit pricing <br />schedule, and the increase will be approximately 11 percent. In very general <br />terms, this cost is typically passed on the new homeowner. <br /> <br />The building permit and other growth related revenues (especially plan check <br />fees) are at the highest level ever in the 1999 municipal budget. The city is <br />gradually becoming dependent on these revenues to finance our building <br />inspection department. Without the adopted increase in the permit schedule, <br />we run the risk of falling short of our budgeted amount, therefore causing the <br />taxpayers to pick up this expense for building inspection (plus some <br />engineering and planning) services. Once again, the City Council may have a <br />concern regarding the cost of development in the community, and whether or <br />not higher fees impact the quality of residential development or has any <br />impact in slowing down the rate of residential development. <br /> <br />From a municipal finance point of view, it is important for us to adopt the <br />scheduled permit pricing fee which is an 11 percent increase over the existing <br />schedule. The adoption of this fee schedule allows us to be consistent with <br />neighboring communities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.