Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />AS K TH E AUTH 0 R JOIN US ONLINE! <br /> <br />During June 21-July 2, go online to participate in our "Ask the Author" forum, an interactive <br />feature of Zoning Practice. David Rouse, A/CP, and Nancy lobi, A/CP, will be available to answer <br />questions about this article. Go to the APA website at www.planning.org and follow the links <br />to the Ask the Author section. From there, just submit your questions about the article using <br />an e-mail link. The authors will reply, posting the answers cumulatively on the website for the <br />benefit of all subscribers. This feature will be available for selected issues of Zoning Practice <br />at announced times. After each online discussion is closed, the answers will be saved in an <br />online archive available through the APA Zoning Practice web pages. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />opment patterns throughout a city or <br />region. In practice, current applications are <br />limited to specified geographic areas due <br />to the newness of the concept, the inten- <br />sive effort needed to develop a form-based <br />code, and political environments that are <br />slow to accept change. California communi- <br />ties have been among the first to adopt the <br />concept, primarily as an implementation <br />mechanism for the specific plan, a provi- <br />sion in the state code authorizing legisla- <br />tively adopted development plans for geo- <br />graphic subareas of a community. Two <br />notable examples include the Pleasant Hill <br />BART ~tation Form Based Code in Contra <br />Costa"County, California, and the Regulating <br />Plan for the Central Hercules Plan in <br />Hercules, California. <br />Elsewhere in the country, a number of <br />communities are developing or adopting <br />form-based codes (e.g., Iowa City, Iowa, <br />Woodford County, Kentucky, and Chicago). <br />One recent example is Arlington County, <br />Virginia, which has implemented a form- <br />based code to revitalize Columbia Pike, an <br />older commercial corridor. <br /> <br />Special conditions: <br />within 100 feet of Main Street <br />required building line; Wakefield <br />to Four-Mile Run, maximum <br />~ four stories <br />-g Maximum <br />~ six stories-"'" <br /><( <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />~ Minimum"""" <br />>- three stories <br />i <br />'" <br />~ <br />8 <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />The Columbia Pike Initiative is a long- <br />range economic development vision to create <br />a vibrant commercial corridor and urban center <br />along a 3.5-mile section of Columbia Pike. The <br />Pike had experienced little development activ- <br />ity in the past 40 years, despite its location in <br />the high-growth Capital Area. The Columbia <br />Pike Master Plan was adopted in 2002 after <br />numerous public charrettes. The subsequent <br />Columbia Pike Special Revitalization District <br />Form-Based Code was prepared by Geoffrey <br />Ferrell Associates (as subconsultants to Dover, <br />Kohl & Partners) and adopted in February <br />2003. This code was designed to implement <br />the vision of the Columbia Pike "Initiative, <br />including creation of a pedestrian-oriented, <br />mixed-use district with a variety of retail, resi- <br />dential, and office uses. <br />The new code contains three main com- <br />ponents: the regulating plan, building enve- <br />lope standards, and architectural and <br />streetscape standards. Analogous to a zoning <br />map but much more detailed in its prescrip- <br />tion of physical form, the regulating plan iden- <br />tifies the building envelope standards to be <br />applied to specific properties, which are <br />coded by their street frontage (Main Street, <br />Avenue, Local, and Neighborhood). The build- <br />ing envelope standards establish basic param- <br /> <br />About the Authors <br /> <br />David Rouse, AICP, is a Senior Associate with <br />Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC (WRT). Nancy <br />Zobl, AICP, is a planner with WRT. <br /> <br />eters for building form, including height, set- <br />backs, and fenestration. They also set broad <br />parameters for mixed uses allowed on the first <br />and upper floors, except that the neighbor- <br />hood frontage sites are primarily restricted to <br />residential uses with some allowances for <br />home offices. <br />The form-based code is applied as an <br />overlay option to the existing zoning districts. <br />" Developers are provided a variety of incen- <br />tives to select this option, including an expe- <br />dited permitting process for developments of <br />40,000 square feet or less (larger develop- <br />ments are subject to special exception <br />review), financial incentives such as modified <br />tax increment financing and rehabilitation tax <br />credits, and relaxed parking requirements. <br />According.to Richard Tucker, county plan- <br />ner for the Columbia Pike Initiative, the develop- <br />ment community has expressed considerable <br />interest in the form-based code since its adop- <br />tion. Developers, architects, and members of <br />the Home Builders Association have praised the <br />clarity of the code and the streamlined review <br />process. Several pending mixed-use develop- <br />ment proposals are the direct result ofthe form- <br />based code. Citizens also support the new <br />code, having been directly involved in shaping it <br />through several design charrettes. <br />Despite the appar- <br />ent initial successes, <br />Tucker notes some chal- <br />lenges related to the <br />newness of the code. <br />Issues tend to arise as <br />proposals are submit- <br />ted by developers who <br />have problems with the <br />standards of the code, <br /> <br /> <br />Street walls required on <br />alley and common lot lines; <br />seven feet maximum height <br /> <br />The Columbia Pike Revitalization Initiative: Illustrates the vision for change along the 3.s-mile corridor under the <br />Columbia Pike Revitalization District Form-Based Code. <br /> <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 05.04 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 3 <br />