5.1 PCSR 01-24-2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

On January 10, 2017, staff emailed the applicant reminding him his CUP was scheduled for the January 24, 2017, Planning Commission meeting. He was again told the city will need all of the information as outlined in the Letter by noon on January 17, 2017. He was informed that if the city did not have all of the information by that date and time; a recommendation of denial would be brought forward to the Planning Commission. On January 12, 2017, the applicant emailed an updated narrative in response to the Letter. No other requested exhibits had been included. He state he was waiting for his consultant to send him the site plans. On January 18, 2017, staff emailed the applicant stating that because the city had not received all of the requested information as outlined in the Letter and emails sent on December 20, 2016; January 6, 2017; and January 10, 2017, he had two options: 1. He could withdraw his application and the city will refund the portion of the escrow not used, or 2. The city takes the request to the Planning Commission and City Council with recommendations of denial and the city would refund the portion of the escrow not used. As of January 19, 2017, staff had not received a response to the two options. Applicable Regulation The issuance of a Conditional Use Permit can be ordered only if the use at the proposed location: 7. mill not endanger, injure or detrimentally affect the use and enjoyment of otherproperty in the immediate vicinity or the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience orgeneral welfare of the neighborhood or the city. Due to the lack of needed and requested information, staff is unable to confirm if the proposal will not endanger, injure or detrimentally affect the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity or the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. 2. mill be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The use will be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. mill not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant propery. Due to the lack of needed and requested information, staff is unable to confirm if the proposal will impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property. 4. bill be served adequately by and will not adversely affect essential public facilities and services including streets, police and fare protection, drainage, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, parks and schools; and will not, in particular, create trac congestion or interference with traffic on adjacent and neighboring public thoroughfares. Due to the lack of needed and requested information, staff is unable to confirm if the proposal will be served adequately by and will not adversely affect essential public facilities and services including streets, police and fire protection, drainage, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, parks and schools; and will not, in particular, create traffic congestion or interference with traffic on adjacent and neighboring public thoroughfares. N: \Departments \Community Development \Planning \Case Files \CUP \CU 16 -35 Northern Tiny Builder \4 Planning Commission \1- 24 -17 \CU 16- 35 sr PC 1- 24- 17.docx