My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES 01-03-2017
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2017
>
01-03-2017
>
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES 01-03-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2016 1:03:57 PM
Creation date
12/29/2016 1:03:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/3/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 11 <br />December 19, 2016 <br />----------------------------- <br /> <br />Mr. Carlton noted the location is zoned for Business Park. <br /> <br />Mayor Dietz stated the city-owned property seems like a good fit because it has been <br />a challenge to market due to its odd size and the power line easements. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wagner stated she is not ready, at this point, to say okay to sell the <br />city-owned property without further information. She expressed concerns with <br />affects to area businesses, traffic, and future growth. She stated the Council needs to <br />review the long-term vision for this entire area and for Spectrum. <br /> <br />Ms. Spark questioned the city’s timetable because they need to make plans soon. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wagner stated she understands the school needs some answers but <br />she can’t provide a timeline at this moment without further review. <br />Mr. Portner stated the city Comprehensive Plan lays out the density for this area and <br />for Twin Lakes Parkway. He stated the road is intended for heavy traffic and is <br />where you want to put a large flow of vehicles. He stated we know where the <br />residential will grow where our municipal state aid funding is at. He stated we have <br />the answer for what this is going to look like. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wagner stated the challenge for her is that the Comprehensive Plan, <br />when approved may not have included the school at its current location. She noted <br />that things change and don’t always follow the plan. <br /> <br />Staff noted the Comprehensive Plan was completed after Spectrum was in place. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wagner noted the school wasn’t initially intended to be at its current <br />location and now we are seeing today the consequences and changes as a result. She <br />stated she needs to know what it means is Spectrum continues to grow and wants to <br />be at 2,000 students. <br /> <br />Ms. Spark stated the cap in their strategic plan for the next 7 years is 1,000 students. <br /> <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated a solution may be to allow the expansion for the 7 <br />years but to change the ordinance so everyone up front knows this is it and any <br />continued growth will have to move offsite. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson noted another challenge with the green space. <br /> <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated it might be best for them to stay at their current <br />location and move into the available building to the west, but then Spectrum knows <br />that in the future there needs to be a different plan at a different site. <br /> <br />Ms. Othoudt stated they would continue to work with school. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.