My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1 BASR 12-27-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
12-27-2016
>
4.1 BASR 12-27-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2025 10:08:22 AM
Creation date
12/21/2016 11:18:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
12/27/2016
case
V 16-16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
is a rearyard by definition, in this case the two non frontyarcls essentially function as side yard r. The proposed <br />setbacks maintain proper .rideyard setbacks The house directly to the west of the subject parcel does not appear to <br />meet side yard setbacks <br />The proposed setback from the western property line is in more compliance than the existing <br />house on the west lot adjoining the subject parcel. A side yard setback dimension is maintained. <br />Staff agrees with the applicant the general purpose and intent of front yard setbacks is to provide <br />a uniform/controlled look to the front of structures. The general purpose and intent of rear and <br />side yard setbacks is to keep structures reasonably separated from one another. The purpose and <br />intent of these setbacks is in harmony with the ordinance. <br />2. Is consistent with the City of Elk River comprehensive plan. <br />The comprehensive plan guider this property as residential. The proposed use is consistent zvith the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />Variances may be granted when the petitioner establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying <br />with the zoning ordinance. Practical difficulties mean that: <br />3. The petitioner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning <br />ordinance; <br />Building a home on a city a�iproved parcel zvith setbacks that are more compliant than neighboring properties is <br />using the property in a reasonable manner. <br />The property is guided for residential uses and the city approved a lot with both a reduced area <br />and lot width. Building a residential home on the subject parcel is reasonable. <br />4. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property not a consequence of <br />the petition's own action or inaction; and <br />The plight of the property is that it received variances for lot .ride and lot width in 2005, prior to the applicant <br />purchasing it. A frontyard setback variance was anticipated when the pmperty wasplatted. <br />The actions on this property happened prior to the applicant purchasing it. <br />5. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />The character of the locale is one of varying frontyard setbacks and apprnving these variances will not alter that <br />character. <br />If granted, the variance will alter the essential character of the locality. <br />Financial Impact <br />None <br />Council Meeting <br />If denied, or an appeal is made by any interested party by January 6, 2017, this item will go to the January <br />1731 2017, (Tuesday) City Council meeting. <br />N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\V\V 16-16 Renae Hauge\3-Board of Adjustments\V 16-16 sr BOA 12-27-16.doca <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.