10-16-2000 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Minutes October 16. 2000 Page 5 . 6.3. Reauest bv Frank Madsen for Administrative Subdivision. Public Hearina - Case No. AS 00-7 Director of Planning Michele McPherson stated that Frank Madsen is requesting an administrative subdivision be approved to subdivide a six-acre parcel into one 2.5 and one 3.5 acre parcel. Ms. McPherson discussed the history of the property. the subdivision requirements. and park dedication fees. Ms. McPherson noted that the county has denied the driveway access permit and the county has no variance policy with its access ordinance. Ms. McPherson stated that the county indicated they would approve the driveway access if the city submitted a letter stating it had no objections to this driveway. Vice Mayor Motin opened the public hearing. Frank Madsen 19640 Proctor Road - stated that he went to the county to obtain a driveway access permit and was told by the county that the new driveway would not meet the county.s minimum spacing requirements. but that he should get a letter from the city stating there is no problem with the driveway access . location. Mr. Madsen stated it would be too expensive to move his driveway and it would make the driveway on the other parcel longer and more expensive to build. . City Engineer Terry Maurer commented that the county should make the driveway access decision. but Mr. Maurer also noted that existing driveways in the area do not meet the county requirements. Tom Mesich 11401 205th Avenue - Stated that the realignment of County Road 33 and the proposed County Road 33/Highway169 interchange could create substantially more traffic on Proctor Avenue. Vice Mayor Motin closed the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER THOMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION WITH THE FOLLOWING FIVE .CONDITIONS: 1. PARK DEDICATION FEES BE PAID. 2. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEES BE PAID 3. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS BE GRANTED ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES. 4. THE APPLICANT SHALL EITHER OBTAIN A PERMIT FROM THE COUNTY FOR ACCESS TO COUNTY ROAD NO. 77. OR IMPLEMENT EITHER OPTION A OR B TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE NEW PARCEL. 5. COUNCIL SEND A LEITER NOT OPPOSING THE DRIVEWAY ACCESS SINCE THERE IS NO VARIANCE PROCEDURE AT THE COUNTY AND ENCOURAGE THE COUNTY TO DEVELOP A VARIANCE PROCEDURE SO THEY CAN DEAL WITH DENIALS. . COUNCILMEMBER FARBER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0.