5.1A PCSR 11-22-2016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(3) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, .rurcef�tibility to flooding, and drainage are suitable for the type and density of development and uses contemplated. The site is suitable for the proposed development. (4) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage transportation, erosion control and all other .reruices, facilities and improvements othenvi.re required in this article. The subdivision has adequate provision for all of these facilities. (5) The proposed .rubdivi.rion will not cause substantial environmental damage. The area is subject of an EAW and will not cause substantial environmental damage. (6) The proposed .cubdivi cion will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of a court. The subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. (7) The proposed .cubdivi.rion will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable development of neighboring land. The property to the north and east are owned by the applicant and the property to the south is a commercial auto repair facility. Highway 169 is west of the subject property. The proposed subdivision will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable development of neighboring land. (8) Theproposed.cubdivicion is notpremature. A .subdivision i.rpremature if any of the folloaving exists: a. Lack of adequate stormavater drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support .yctemr. The area is subject of an EAW and will adequately address these requirements. The project appears to be consistent with the first seven required findings for approval of the Preliminary Plat but requirement number eight will need to be evaluated once the EAW is received and reviewed. If there are major concerns with the report that would not support the CUP request, staff will bring this item back to the commission for further review. If denial of the plat should occur, it shall accompany recommendations or determinations by findings or a report stating how the proposed use does not comply with the standards set forth in Section 30 -375. Financial Impact None Statutory Review Period N: \Departments \Community Development \Planning \Case Files \P \P 16 -19 Aggregate Commercial 5th \3 - Planning Commission \P 16-19 sr PC 11- 22 -1 G.docx