My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.2. SR 10-09-2000
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2000
>
10/09/2000
>
4.2. SR 10-09-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2015 2:24:02 PM
Creation date
1/20/2005 2:43:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
10/9/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. The city has not had one person function as a clearinghouse for how our <br />symbol/logo can be used, nor do we have any guidelines for its use in order to <br />be presenting a consistent and professional image. In this regard, if this <br />project is approved, I am having City Clerk, Sandy Peine, be in charge of the <br />project and ultimately be given the responsibility and authority to function as <br />the clearinghouse for our city logo/design. Sandy and the Utilities General <br />Manager will have to work together so that both organizations are "on the <br />same page" in the use of the Elk symbol. <br /> <br />I approached Anita about the city project as an expansion of the Utilities <br />project and we first put together a quick list of everyplace that we could think <br />of where the Elk appears. This list is attached and is quite lengthy. We were <br />both surprised at how far and wide the Elk has traveled in the city and it <br />became clear that one of our most important needs is the establishment of a <br />communication strategy/guidelines on how the Elk can be used. The project is <br />really about what message the city (and it's Economic Development <br />Department) wants to present. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I have asked for Anita and Tammy's proposal to only provide us with two <br />options for a different look in our logo/symbol. Obviously, we are going to <br />continue using the Elk, but other than that we are open. Per my conversations <br />with Anita, the Staff Committee will look at the two proposals and recommend <br />one to the City Council for approval. Use of the logo/symbol may not have to be <br />identical across all departments but will have to be "complimentary and of the <br />same family." In this regard Anita has indicated that it may be possible for <br />various colors to be used with the Elk. <br /> <br />The price of the project is $19,750 and initially seemed high to me but this is a <br />very large-scale project and has long term ramifications for the city and for its <br />Economic Development efforts. Anita has completed one project for the city <br />and is currently working on another, both of which are related to Economic <br />Development. In both proposals the initial fee was presented and ultimately <br />the work was revised and the cost came down. When everything was said and <br />done, we ended up having Anita either schedule extra meetings or extend the <br />time for various meetings so that ultimately we ended up with almost the <br />original proposal for reduced fee. This didn't seem fair, but that's what <br />transpired. I think this requested fee is appropriate for this project and that <br />we shouldn't try to economize by cutting out "bits and pieces" of the proposal. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I am requesting that the EDA participate in the amount of 25% of the project, <br />as this project is directly related to the implementation of the Industrial <br />Marketing Plan. Funding for the EDA share of the project would come from its <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.