My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.1A BASR 10-25-2016 DRAFT MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
10-25-2016
>
3.1A BASR 10-25-2016 DRAFT MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2016 10:54:36 AM
Creation date
10/21/2016 10:54:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
10/25/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustments Minutes Page 5 <br />September 27, 2016 <br /> <br />----------------------------- <br />2.Is consistent with the City of Elk River comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Crook and seconded by Commissioner Thiel that <br />the request meet does not meet Criteria #2. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />3.The petitioner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by <br />the zoning ordinance. <br />Motion by Commissioner Feinstein and seconded by Commissioner Thiel <br />that the request does not meet Criteria #3. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />4.The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to t <br />consequence of the petition's own action or inaction. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Crook and seconded by Commissioner Larson <br />that the request does not meet Criteria #4. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />5.The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />Motion by Commissioner Thiel and seconded by Commissioner Feinstein <br />that the request does not meet Criteria #5. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Larson-Vito and seconded by Commissioner Crook to <br />deny the request by Vanman on behalf of Gateway church for a second freestanding <br />sign, Case No. V 16-10, based on the finding that the five criteria cannot be met. <br />Motion carried 5-0. <br /> ----------------------------- <br />The Board of Adjustments reviewed the five criteria for the additional sign height variance <br />request as follows: <br /> <br />1.Is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinan <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Crook and seconded by Commissioner Larson <br />that the request does not meet Criteria #1. Motion carried 5-0. <br />2.Is consistent with the City of Elk River comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Crook and seconded by Commissioner Thiel that the <br />request meet does not meet Criteria #2. Motion carried 5-0. <br />3.The petitioner proposes to use the property in a reasonable mann <br />zoning ordinance. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Feinstein and seconded by Commissioner Larson-Vito <br />that the request does not meet Criteria #3. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.