My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-2016 EDA MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Minutes
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
09-19-2016 EDA MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2016 9:57:20 AM
Creation date
10/20/2016 10:32:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDM
date
9/19/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Economic Development Authority Minutes Page 2 <br />September 19, 2016 <br />----------------------------- <br />Commissioner Provo asked what happens with the fees if a business is denied the tax <br />abatement request. <br /> <br />Commissioner Tveite stated this is a fee to recoup costs and not a revenue source. <br /> <br />Ms. Othoudt stated the applicant is reimbursed unused fees. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ovall stated the EDA Finance Committee expressed concerns with <br />the fees and costs of consultants, such as Springsted, and staff is considering internal <br />review for some programs. <br /> <br />Ms. Othoudt further noted the city offers many programs which each require <br />different types of review. She stated staff is looking at reviewing microloans, tax <br />abatements, and tax increment in-house. She stated staff is looking at continuing to <br />use Springsted for tax abatements and tax increment finances, but to internally <br />review microloans. <br /> <br />The Commission concurred that a Request for Proposal should be drafted for <br />financial consultant firms. <br /> <br />Moved by Commissioner Westgaard and seconded by Commissioner Olson to <br />approve the Tax Abatement Policy as outlined in the staff report. <br /> <br />Commissioner Provo suggested changing the language in Section VII.A.1 as follows: <br /> <br />Applicant submits the completed application along with a $5 10,000 application <br />deposit, to be refunded for any portions not utilized. <br /> <br />The maker and seconder of the motion concurred with the language change. <br /> <br />Motion carried 7-0. <br /> <br />6.2 Director’s Report <br /> <br />Ms. Othoudt presented the staff report. <br /> <br />7. Announcements <br /> <br />There were no announcments. <br /> ----------------------------- <br /> <br />The EDA recessed in order to go into worksession at 5:52 p.m.. <br /> <br />The EDA reconvened at. 5:54 p.m. Commissioner Olson was not at this portion of <br />the meeting. <br /> <br />8.1 City Beautification Award Program <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.