My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. ERMUSR 10-11-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2016
>
10-11-2016
>
4.1. ERMUSR 10-11-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2016 10:38:32 AM
Creation date
10/10/2016 10:38:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
10/11/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
account the estimated unmetered usage, only the metered usage, and this measurement has been <br /> between 8.01%and 15.39%,with an average of 11.60%. It would be non-transparent to set the <br /> bar at 10% and allow the measurement to contain estimated data. It would also be unfair to set <br /> the bar at 10% and dismiss this unmetered component. Therefore,perhaps the bar needs to be <br /> set at a higher percentage,benchmarked against the appropriate industry standard. According to <br /> the Key Performance Indicator(KPI) library,the industry range is 11.36%to 19.07%with an <br /> average target of 11.28%. Given this information, I ask the commission to set the Water Loss <br /> criteria at no less than 11.28%. <br /> Additionally it was discussed implementing a physical fitness incentive, and staff was directed to <br /> seek legal advice for implementation compliance. After consulting with our attorney,we have <br /> been advised that this would not be an appropriate metric for our organization. Two concerns <br /> were noted. The first concern is a Minnesota law prohibiting physical examinations unless a <br /> business necessity can be proven, and evaluation of a performance metric would not be deemed a <br /> business necessity. The other concern was compliance with EEOC regulations regarding <br /> disability accommodations. It would be "hopelessly complex"to try and incorporate that with <br /> our job descriptions since they are so varied. Given the legal advice,this metric suggestion <br /> should not be considered. <br /> Also,the Customer Satisfaction sub-category goal could be increased to 90%instead of 85%. <br /> We strive for excellent customer service and that is better represented at the higher percentage. <br /> Finally, with the introduction of a new Line Loss and Water Loss items worth 10 points in the <br /> Safety,Reliability and Quality of Services category, a redistribution of points is needed, <br /> otherwise we have 110%percent,not 100%. A suggestion of making the same category 40%, <br /> and reducing the Financial Goals category to 30%(with the sub-percent changing to 15 for <br /> Margins/Net Profit and 5 for Inventory Accuracy) has been presented. The commission would <br /> need to make this final determination. <br /> Presented is a revised score card with the suggested options for consideration, and suggested <br /> points distribution. <br /> ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> Approval of a revised Performance Metrics criteria with a determination of Water Loss%, and <br /> the points determination with the related Score Card. <br /> ATTACHMENTS: <br /> • Performance Metrics and Incentive Compensation Policy Score Card <br /> ifPOWEREO Al <br /> . ;; Page 2 of 2 NATURE <br /> Reliable Public <br /> Power Provider POWERED To SERVE <br /> 119 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.