My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1 BASR 09-27-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
09-27-2016
>
4.1 BASR 09-27-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2025 10:03:35 AM
Creation date
9/22/2016 1:58:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
9/27/2016
case
V 16-08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Request for Action <br />To <br />Item Number <br />Board of Adjustments <br />4.1 <br />Agenda Section <br />Meeting Date <br />Prepared by <br />Public Hearings <br />September 27, 2016 <br />Chris Leeseber , Senior Planner <br />Item Description <br />Reviewed by <br />Glen Brown — 604 5th Street NW <br />Zack Carlton, Planning Manager <br />■ Variance to driveway width regulations, Case <br />Reviewed by <br />No. V 16-08 <br />Action Requested <br />Approve by motion, the driveway width variance for the following reasons: <br />1. The general purpose and intent of the ordinance are met if the driveway is limited to 40 feet wide. <br />2. The property has a land use of residential and the use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />3. The proposed use on the property, while adhering to setbacks, would be used in a reasonable <br />manner and is permitted in the zoning ordinance. <br />4. The existing driveway is a legal non -conforming driveway that will move closer to compliance <br />with a variance. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property not a <br />consequence of the petitioners own action or inaction. <br />5. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />And with the following conditions: <br />1. The driveway shall not exceed 40 feet in width anywhere along its length and shall be setback at <br />least 5 feet from the property lines. <br />2. Turf shall be established for the five feet of property between the west edge of the driveway and <br />the property line. <br />3. The applicant will be responsible for all permits and incurred costs for the demolition and <br />construction of the curbing. <br />Deny by motion, the driveway setback variance for the following reasons: <br />1. The general purpose and intent of the ordinance are not met if the driveway is installed adjacent <br />to a neighboring property with no setback. <br />3. Installing a driveway next to an adjacent neighboring property with no setback is not using the <br />property in a reasonable manner. <br />Background/Discussion <br />The corner lot property is located at 604 5"' Street and is zoned R1-c with the following driveway <br />requirements: <br />■ Residential driveways shall not exceed 30 feet in width measured at the front property line. <br />■ Single-family lots shall be limited to one driveway, except corner lots shall be allowed to have one <br />driveway on each street, not to exceed 40 feet in total combined width. <br />■ In single-family residential zoning districts no driveway or parking area shall be located within five <br />feet of a side or rear property line. <br />p a w E R E U 6 Y <br />NaA f RE] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.