My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.2 BASR 09-27-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
09-27-2016
>
4.2 BASR 09-27-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2025 10:04:00 AM
Creation date
9/22/2016 1:46:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
9/27/2016
case
V 16-10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of <br />El <br />River <br />Request for Action <br />To <br />Item Number <br />Board of Adjustments <br />14.2 <br />Agenda Section <br />Meeting Date <br />I <br />Prepared by <br />Public Hea6 <br />September 27, 2016 <br />BrieAnna Simon, Planner <br />Item Description <br />Reviewed by <br />Vanman Architects and Builders - Gateway Church <br />Peter Beck, City Attorney <br />13913 185th Ave NW <br />Reviewed by <br />■ A second freestanding sign in a residential <br />Zack Carlton, Planning Manager <br />district <br />■ 55 foot variance to structure height limit (20 <br />feet), Case No. V 16-10 <br />Action Requested <br />Additional Sian <br />Deny, by motion, the variance request by Vanman Architects and Builders to allow a second freestanding <br />signs for the following reasons: <br />1. The variance is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance. <br />2. An additional sign is not consistent with permitted institutional uses in a residential district. <br />3. The proposed additional sign is not using the property in a reasonable manner. <br />4. There is no hardship unique to the property, as the property already has a functioning sign on site <br />which can be increased in height, increasing visibility, while maintaining ordinance requirements. <br />5. The essential character of the locality will be altered if the number of signs exceed the limit for <br />permitted nonresidential uses in a residentially zoned district. <br />Additional Height <br />Deny, by motion, the additional height variance request for the following reasons: <br />1. The variance is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance. <br />2. A sign three times the allowed height is not consistent with permitted institutional uses in a <br />residential district. <br />3. The additional height is not using the property in a reasonable manner. <br />4. There is no hardship unique to the property, as the property already has a functioning sign on site <br />which can be increased in height, increasing visibility, while maintaining ordinance requirements. <br />5. The essential character of the locality will be altered if a sign exceeding the allowed height by <br />more than three times is allowed. <br />If the Board of Adjustments denies the request, or an appeal is made by any interested party by October <br />10, 2016, the application will automatically be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. That <br />meeting will be held on Monday, October 17, 2016, at 6:00 p.m. <br />pI•EaII Ir <br />NA ME <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.