My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.10. SR 12-20-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
12/20/2004
>
5.10. SR 12-20-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:02 AM
Creation date
12/17/2004 10:19:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/20/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />such as cluster development. This analysis was conducted after the complexity of the <br />field work, so that data from the NRI could inform the process. This evaluation <br />focused on sites that contain quality natural areas and have the potential to be <br />developed. Areas that were considered not to be unsuitable for development had <br />characteristics such as being completely covered by floodplain/wetlands, previously <br />permitted for aggregate mining, and city-owned land (parks). <br /> <br />On some of the recommended parcels, property access prevented a field inventory. <br />These are noted in th'e project data base as recommended for additional field <br />inventory. Where additional surveys are recommended, they should occur prior to <br />development, most preferably in advance of submittal of development documents to <br />the City by the developer. This will allow for the gathering of solid field information to <br />permit sound decision-making about natural areas, as well as minimizing the cost of <br />such a process to both the City and developer. The following page shows parcels <br />identified as suitable for cluster development and other non-standard design methods. <br /> <br />Sites to Consider for Proactive Management/Protection <br />There are a number of remnant natural areas on city-owned property or that occur on <br />recreational/historic properties. Based on field observations, we recommend these <br />areas be (further) managed. This may include the creation of site-specific Natural <br />Resource Management Plans and/or on-the-ground management. It is also important <br />to note that these natural areas may be good candidates for grant/foundation funding <br />to complete these activities, reducing or enhancing the financial resources dedicated <br />by the City. <br /> <br />City-owned Natural Areas <br />The City owns a number of properties with moderate to high quality natural areas that <br />have good restoration potential. Many of these occur in City Parks. Some of the City <br />Park areas appear to be actively managed, while others are not. Following is a brief <br />list of City-owned natural areas that support high quality resources, as well as some <br />recommended next steps for management. <br /> <br />Non-City-owned Historical/Recreation Properties <br />There are two historical/recreation areas within the City of Elk River that have natural <br />areas of significance. These include the Elk River Sportsmen Club and the Kelley <br />Farm. The former is a private club that supports very high quality barrens prairie and <br />savanna of statewide significance. The Kelley Farm is a property run by the <br /> <br />City of Elk River. MN - Natural Resouce Inventory <br />Bonestroo Natural Resources. September 2004 <br /> <br />49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.