Laserfiche WebLink
<br />detention time of 3 to 5 minutes at design peak hourly flows. Assuming a 3-minute <br />detention time, the peak flow rate through the existing tank is 0.56 MGD, which is well <br />below the CUlTent peak day flow. Additionally, head10ss through the grit tank at higher <br />flow rates becomes problematic upstream. The grit tank is structurally sound and is in <br />working order, but at higher flow rates, it is expected to become less effective and to <br />cause hydraulic problems. <br /> <br />Grit is pumped ITom the grit tank sump using one of two 200 gallons per minute (GPM), <br />16-foot total dynamic head (TDH), 5 horsepower (hp), 1,725 revolutions per minute <br />(rpm), horizontal vortex type pumps. One grit pump is duty and one is standby. The grit <br />is dewatered through a grit classifier and hydro cyclone installed in 2002 and discharged <br />to disposal containers. The grit cyclone, in combination with the grit washing and <br />classification equipment, is capable of removing at least 95 percent of the 150-mesh grit <br />having a specific gravity of 2.65 or greater ITom the underflow of the grit tank. The <br />classifier and cyclone are sized to handle a grit flow of 200 GPM. <br /> <br />Grit is currently discharged into 20-gallon plastic garbage pails and collected in the grit <br />building for disposal. The grit equipment collects approximately 20 gallons of grit each <br />day. Plant staff gather the garbage pails weekly and dispose the grit at the hmdfil1. This <br />is a high maintenance process for plant staff and a safety hazard due to ITequent changing <br />of garbage pails. <br /> <br />FUTURE WASTEWATER FLOW <br /> <br />Operating data, population projections, and Ten State Standards provide a basis to project the <br />design flow for the year 2025 for the Elk River Headworks design concept. Operating data <br />show the 2003 A WW flow was 1.1 MGD with a PHWW flow rate of 1.8 MGD, thus giving a <br />peaking factor of 1.6. Howard R. Green Company evaluated the ultimate plant size based on <br />land available for expansion of various process units. The existing plant site has the capacity <br />to accommodate an average flow of 4.8 MGD limited by final clarifier capacity. Figure I <br />shows a site layout of the Elk River Wastewater Treatment Plant with tentative future <br />expansion and the current and expanded flow rates of various processes. <br /> <br />The City of Elk River population for the year 2025 is projected to be 35,000. Based on Ten <br />State Standards, the average per capita flow is 100 gallons per day, which gives a total <br />average flow of3.5 MGD for Elk River. Using a conservative peaking factor of2, peak flow <br />rate projects to 7.0 MGD for the year 2025. <br /> <br />General Improvements <br />As indicated by Ten State Standards, unit processes should be designed to handle <br />hydraulic peak flows. The proposed bar screens and grit units have been designed to <br />accommodate a peak flow of 7.0 MGD. Bar screen channels have been evaluated at a <br />flow of7.0 MGD to verify that the flow velocity and ITeeboard meet Ten State Standards. <br />The existing Parshall Flume is sized for a flow of 10.4 MGD and replacement has not <br /> <br />4 <br />