My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3. SR 12-20-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
12/20/2004
>
5.3. SR 12-20-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:01 AM
Creation date
12/16/2004 4:19:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/20/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Elk River City Council Meeting <br />June 19 2000 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Richard Martens, again requested the council to consider assessing the park <br />dedication and surface water management fees on a pro-rata basis against <br />each parcei at the time of buiiding permit issuance. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commissioner Dana Anderson indicated he was in favor of <br />having the developer pay the park dedication fee and stated he was concerned <br />about the city setting a precedence regarding the pay-as-you-go procedure. <br /> <br />Mayor Kiinzing indicated that she is interested in collecting all of the park <br />dedication fees and is interested in allowing deferment of payment until time of <br />building permit application. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER FARBER MOVED TO WAIVE THE PARK DEDICATION FEE. <br /> <br />THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF ASECOND. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER THOMPSON MOVED TO DIRECT STAFF TO NEGOTIATE THE PARK <br />DEDICATION FEE WITH THE DEVELOPER AND METHOD OF PAYMENT AND TO REPORT <br />BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL. COUNCILMEMBER FARBER SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />THE MOTION CARRIED 3-1. Mayor Kiinzing opposed. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the councii that the Park and Recreation Commission <br />would not be a part of these negotiations. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Scott Harlicker indicated that Home Depot is request' an <br />easement vacation for a portion of a drainage and utiiity ease t located at <br />the northeast corner of Lot 1. Block 1. Home Depot Addition. ott reviewed the <br />staff report. <br /> <br /> <br />6.4. Re uest b Home De at U.S.A. Inc. for Easement Vacation <br />No. EV 00-5 <br /> <br /> <br />Mayor Kiinzing opened the public hearing. There b . g no one far or against the <br />matter, Mayor Klinzing closed the public hearin <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER THOMPSON MOVED TO OPT RESOLUTION 00-43 FOR <br />VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EAS ENTS, CASE NO. EV 00-5 WITH THE <br />FOLLOWING CONDITION: <br /> <br />6.5. <br /> <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />CITY ENGINEER BE ADDRESSED. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER FA <br /> <br />SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br />Public <br /> <br />Direc r of Planning Michele McPherson stated that the City of Elk River is <br />re esting to vacate the drainage easement for a portion of Branch A Ditch <br />10. iocated on the Elk River Business Park property. Michele reviewed the staff <br />report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.