My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.1. SR 08-01-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
08-01-2016
>
10.1. SR 08-01-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2016 11:26:55 AM
Creation date
7/29/2016 10:18:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/1/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\CUP\CU 12-17 Alliance\SR to CC CU 12-17 Alliance <br />OS 10-15-12.docx <br />REQUEST FOR ACTION <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />TO <br />Mayor and City Council <br />ITEM NUMBER <br />7.3 <br />AGENDA SECTION <br />Public Hearings <br />MEETING DATE <br />October 15, 2012 <br />PREPARED BY <br />Jeremy Barnhart, Planning Manager <br />ITEM DESCRIPTION <br />Conditional Use Permit: Alliance Machine/Bryan Provo for <br />Outdoor Storage in the Business Park Zoning District, Case No. <br />CU 12-17 <br />REVIEWED By <br />Cal Portner, City Administrator <br />REVIEWED BY <br /> <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED <br />Staff and the Planning Commission recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit on the grounds <br />that the application is inconsistent with the requirements of outdoor storage in the Business Park. <br /> <br />The Council has a number of options: <br />1. The Council could accept modifications to the outdoor storage proposal made by the applicant to <br />conform to the requirements established by Ordinance. <br />2. The Council could return any modifications made by the applicant to the Planning Commission <br />for review and recommendation. <br />3. The Council could deny the application by directing staff to prepare a Findings of Fact for denial <br />for adoption at the November 19, 2012, City Council meeting. <br /> <br />It is likely that the applicant will modify his proposal. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION <br />The development of an ordinance allowing outdoor storage is progressing though the review process <br />(OA 12-04). The applicant was not at the Planning Commission meeting to agree to the <br />recommendations made by the Commission; staff and the Commission felt it more appropriate to <br />recommend denial due to the gap between what is proposed for outdoor storage and what the <br />Commission recommends as ordinance language. <br /> <br />Proposal <br />The applicant proposed a 30 foot x 30 foot area enclosed by an 8 foot high black steel chain link fence. <br />Screening is proposed with vinyl slats inserted through the fence. The area would be located adjacent to <br />the accessory structure on the property and would house a trailer. <br /> <br />Planning Commission comments <br />The Planning Commission agreed with staff’s recommendation that due to the inconsistencies with the <br />proposed ordinance, the application should be denied. <br /> <br />Public Hearing comments <br />No comments have been received for or against this proposal. There have been three public hearings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.