Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustments Minutes Page 5 <br /> June 28,2016 <br /> a. Size of Accessory Structures <br /> Motion by Commissioner Larson-Vito and seconded by Commissioner Nicholas <br /> that the request meets Criteria#4. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> b. Number of Accessory Structures <br /> Motion by Commissioner Larson-Vito and seconded by Commissioner Thiel that <br /> the request does not meets Criteria#4. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> 5. The variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Nicholas and seconded by Commissioner Feinstein <br /> that the request meets Criteria#5. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Nicholas and seconded by Commissioner Larson-Vito to <br /> approve the request by Church of St.Andrews for Variance to the maximum size of <br /> accessory structures,based on the following findings: <br /> 1. The general purpose and intent of the ordinance are met. <br /> 2. The property has a land use of residential and the use is consistent with the <br /> comprehensive plan. <br /> 3. The proposed use is reasonable and is permitted in the zoning ordinance. <br /> 4. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property not a <br /> consequence of the petitioners own action or inaction. <br /> 5. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> and,with the following conditions: <br /> 1. The total allowed square footage for the combined subject properties (534 4th <br /> Street&524 4th Street) shall not exceed 1,700 square feet. <br /> 2. The total number of detached accessory structures for the combined subject <br /> properties (534 4th Street& 524 4th Street) shall not exceed two (2). <br /> 3. The demolition permit for the home at 524 4th Street shall not be approved until <br /> the two parcels are combined. <br /> Motion carried 6-0. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Larson-Vito and seconded by Commissioner Thiel to deny <br /> the request by Church of St.Andrews for Variance to the maximum number of <br /> accessory structures,based on the following findings: <br /> 1. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property but is <br /> a consequence of the petitioners own action or inaction. <br /> Motion carried 6-0. <br /> Mr. Leeseberg noted that the denial of the second portion of the variance will be <br /> automatically appealed to the City Council at their July 18,2016,meeting. <br />