My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.1. SR 07-18-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
07-18-2016
>
8.1. SR 07-18-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2016 12:54:12 PM
Creation date
7/15/2016 11:13:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/18/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />MARKET ANALYSIS <br />City of Elk River, MN <br />Feasibility Study * <br />Page 59 <br /> Section V – Operations Analysis <br /> <br /> <br />Operations Analysis <br /> <br />The operations analysis represents a conservative approach to estimating expenses and revenues <br />and was completed based on the best information available and a basic understanding of the <br />aquatic project. Fees and charges utilized for this study represent the current fee structure and <br />market value and are subject to review, change, and approval by the City of Elk River. There is <br />no guarantee that the expense and revenue projections outlined in the operations analysis will be <br />met as there are many variables that affect such estimates that either cannot be accurately <br />measured or are subject to change during the actual budgetary process. The revenue and expense <br />projections for 2017 provide an allowance for future operating costs and fees. <br /> <br />Expenditures <br /> <br />Expenditures have been formulated on the costs that were designated by the consultant to be <br />included in the operating budget for the facility. The figures are based on the size of the aquatic <br />center, the specific components of the facility, and the hours of operation. All expenses were <br />calculated to the high side and the actual cost may be less based on the final design, operational <br />philosophy, and programming considerations adopted by staff. <br /> <br /> <br />Revenues <br /> <br />The revenue projections were formulated from information on the specifics of the project and the <br />demographics of the service area as well as comparing them to national statistics, other similar <br />facilities and the competition for recreation services in the area. Actual figures will vary based on <br />the size and makeup of the components selected during final design, market stratification, <br />philosophy of operation, fees and charges policy, and priority of use. All revenues were <br />calculated conservatively as a result. <br /> <br /> <br />APPENDIX B
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.