Laserfiche WebLink
2.0 CONSENT AGENDA(Approved By One Motion) <br /> John Dietz had a few questions on the Electric Cost-of-Service and Rate Design Study, staff <br /> responded. <br /> Al Nadeau moved to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: <br /> 2.1 May Check Register <br /> 2.2 May 10,2016 Previous Meeting Minutes <br /> 2.3 Financial Statements <br /> 2.4 2015 Consumer Confidence Report <br /> 2.5 Wellhead Protection Plan Implementation Evaluation and Work Plan <br /> 2.6 Consulting Services for Electric Cost-of-Service and Rate Design Study <br /> Daryl Thompson seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. <br /> 5.1 Award of Bonds 2016A and Refunding of Electric Bonds 2016B <br /> At the May 10th meeting, the Commission passed a resolution to proceed with the issuance <br /> of$10,000,000 2016A bonds, and the refunding of the bond 2007A issue of$1,460,000 <br /> 2016B bonds, and the City Council passed it at the May 16th meeting. At that time it was <br /> identified that the award of the bonds by the Utility Commission would come back and be <br /> on the June 14th agenda. Proposals for the sale of the bonds were received this morning, <br /> June 14, until 10:00 a.m. <br /> Terri Heaton from Springsted presented the market sale information results. For the 2016A <br /> Electric Revenue Bonds, subsequent to bid opening,the issue size decreased from <br /> $10,000,000 to $9,755,000 due to a premium with the offer. Terri presented the bids and <br /> announced that the Wells Fargo Bank, National Association came in as the low bidder with <br /> a true interest rate of 2.31%. For the 2016B Electric Revenue Refunding Bonds, <br /> subsequent to bid opening,the issue size decreased from$1,460,000 to $1,370,000. The <br /> Robert W. Baird& Company, Incorporated was the low bidder with a true interest rate of <br /> 1.32%. Terri shared that based on the lower interest rate and reduced underwriter fees, the <br /> final results of the bond refunding reflected a total savings of$94,737. <br /> The rating call for both bonds was conducted on May 31St. It was decided to stay to with <br /> Moody's for rating purposes; we currently have an Aa3 rating. Terri shared that ERMU <br /> staff did a fabulous job on the rating call and really represented the utilities well. Teri <br /> pointed out the highlights in Moody's review, which included ERMU's credit strengths and <br /> credit challenges. Based on the information reviewed, Moody's has assigned an Aa3 rating <br /> to ERMU's $11.5 million Electric Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A and Electric Revenue <br /> Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B. There was discussion on the rating. Troy Adams pointed <br /> out that Theresa Slominski and her staff put a great deal of effort into putting together the <br /> packet used for the rating call, and that along with years of good utility decision making is <br /> Page 2 <br /> Special Meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br /> June 14,2016 <br /> 24 <br />