My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.3. SR 06-29-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1998
>
06/29/1998 - SPECIAL
>
4.3. SR 06-29-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:01 AM
Creation date
12/6/2004 1:35:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/29/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Elk River <br />June 19, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />are prepared to make the following recommendations, relative to adjustments <br />to the assessment roll. <br /> <br />1. 75-131-1435, Joseph and Delores Bickman <br /> <br />We would recommend that this property be reduced from two <br />units to one unit. The reason for this adjustment is that it was <br />given two units because the property immediately next door is <br />also in the ownership of Joseph Bickman. It was felt when the <br />roll was put together, that these two lots could be combined and <br />redivided into three buildable lots. Therefore, this parcel was <br />given two units, and the parcel next door was given one unit. <br />However, on further review, one parcel is in the ownership of <br />Joseph and Delores Bickman, and the other is in the ownership <br />of Joseph and Michael Bickman. Therefore, it is appropriate to <br />assess each of these for only one unit. <br /> <br />2. 132-1110, Steven and Lisa Freitag <br /> <br />This parcel was given two units because of its size, however this <br />information was based on a half-section that did not reflect a <br />recent split of the parcel. The parcel was actually split into two <br />properties. The second property is PIN number 75-132-1111, <br />and is owned by David and Kim Long. The two units should be <br />split, one to the Freitag property and one to the Long property, <br />reflecting the division of the parcel. <br /> <br />3. 75-131-1425, Thomas and Sara Hartman <br /> <br />Thomas and Sara Hartman have several parcels in the <br />assessment roll with a total assessment of 8 units. Upon further <br />review, we feel that 7 units is a more appropriate total for all of <br />their parcels combined. Therefore, we would recommend that <br />this parcel (75-131-1425) be reduced from 2 units to 1 units. <br /> <br />Individuals may appeal their assessment to this project by presenting a <br />signed, written objection to the Mayor at the hearing. An individual <br />simply standin!! UP at the assessment hearin!! indicatin!! their <br />objection to the project does not constitute an assessment appeal. <br />Following the submission of the signed, written objection, the property owner <br />must also serve notice of appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within <br />30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll. They must file their notice <br /> <br />Howard R. Green Company <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.