Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council ~finutes <br />November 8, 2004 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />----------------------------- <br /> <br />benefit increase by the council. which is consistent with the budget and union contract. She <br />stated that meetings have been held today with all employee groups. She stated that the two <br />things evaluated were that employees would not have to change their doctor and premium <br />differences. <br /> <br />She 'explained that Blue Cross/Blue Shield's premiums would have an annual savings over <br />the amounts paid in 2004 for employees for family coverage of $3,000; for single coverage <br />of $900. She explained that this plan would be through Central Minnesota Service Co-op, <br />which serves ciries, school districts and other government agencies. She stated that the <br />Utilities also has their coverage through this co-op. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dietz inquired if the Utilities could go with our group. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson stated that they could but that they have a different structure. <br /> <br />The Council agreed that the Blue Cross/Blue Shield proposal was the best option available. <br />It was the consensus of the Council to enter into a contract with Blue Cross/Blue Shield <br />unless there are renewal or other concerns that the Finance Director may have after meeting <br />with them in the near future. This item will be placed on the November 15 Council Agenda <br />for formal action. <br /> <br />4.2 .Joint Meeting- with EDA to Discuss Industrial Development <br /> <br />President Gongoll called the EDA ~eering to order at 6:48 p.m. Members also present <br />were Larry Koenig and Pat Dwyer. <br /> <br />Executive Director Catherine Mehelich explained that in the past the EDA has directed staff <br />to work with the private landowners before considering development of city-owned sites. <br />Over the past 6 months staff has received a number of inquires for the City-owned Cargill <br />land and the EDA-owned Brown land. Staff has worked with Ehlers & Associates to <br />analyze the cost barrier and has met with private owners. A draft agreement for joint <br />markering and development was provided to landowners in July and to date staff has not <br />received any comments from the landowners regarding this draft agreement. The strategy is <br />to put all land in the city on a level playing field and yet be competitive with the market. <br />Recently the EDA Markering Committee recommended that the EDA consider opening a <br />phase of its property for industrial development. <br /> <br />Ms. Mehelich explained that the Cargill property could have the first two lots developed but <br />that the remainder is not available for development until late 2005. If the YMCA should <br />develop on the Brown property, they may need 10 acres, which may include lots 17, 18, 1, <br />and 2 on the concept design. <br /> <br />She explained how other cities have funded infrastructure improvements: City of Ramsey <br />with excess revenues from an older TIF District (Elk River doesn't have any), City of Big <br />Lake with Tax Increment Bond with the city reimbursing itself, or City of Monticello where <br />the EDA levied $I million, purchased the first part of the property with that money, makes <br />payments from the levy and writes down from $3 to $1 per square foot. She stated that the <br />MN Department of Economic Development has grant money available for cities to open <br />Industrial Parks and is accepting applications on an open basis. <br /> <br />She stated that the manufacturers are price sensitive and wish to put as little cash down as <br />possible. Tbe estimated cost to develop an industrial park on the Brown property owned by <br />