My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.1. SR 07-05-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
07-05-2016
>
10.1. SR 07-05-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2016 8:15:18 AM
Creation date
7/1/2016 8:14:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/5/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ELK RIVER COMMUNITY CENTER <br /> CONCEPTUAL SOLUTIONS <br /> SITE OPTION 5: <br /> ORONO PARK - DAVE ANDERSON <br /> ATHLETIC COMPLEXbk <br /> 4 <br /> z _ <br /> er <br /> ORONO PAM <br /> 18559 Gary Street L <br /> The Orono Park site offers a great multitude of opportunity for a potential new facility in many regards. Although it is not as <br /> centrally located as Lion John Weicht Park, it is largely accessible by vehicles and pedestrians alike, with access to Highway Ten from both <br /> Joplin Street and Gary Street. The site is located directly adjacent to Lake Orono and would have access to the park amenities currently in <br /> place at the beach side Orono Park. Pedestrian access to the site will be improved in the future as the city constructs the trunk Highway Ten <br /> trail that will connect Orono Park to Proctor Avenue. The Orono Park site also provides convenient proximity to other existing city owned <br /> community buildings including City Hall, The Library, Police/Fire Department, and the YMCA. Locating the facility here would continue to <br /> develop a 'campus' of city owned and ran community buildings. <br /> Perhaps the greatest advantage to this site is it's proximity to Orono Park and Lake Orono. This could be captured in the facility by taking <br /> advantage of the views eastward toward the lake and even including some outdoor patio or garden space off the building that could tie <br /> the building to it's adjacent exterior community spaces. Both concept options 1 and 2 would provide views of the lake from the community <br /> and commons spaces. The site's flatness and expansiveness make it prime and ready for building construction (pending the relocation and <br /> new construction of existing ballfields) which could save money on site development costs. The site also provides opportunities in the future <br /> for other development on or near the site in the open area to the south,and the existing county fairground property to the east. The existing <br /> openness on the site and adjacent fairgrounds could also save money upfront by allowing the potential for the new facility to use existing <br /> open space for large event parking. The fact that the site doesn't have a lot of existing constraints translates to multiple opportunities and <br /> options for orienting the facility. Option 1 explores the idea of aligning a main entry commons to be focused on the Lake as one enters the <br /> building. The negative to this is that it puts the largest and tallest volumes of the building (the ice spaces)on the south side of the building thus <br /> shading the entry during the winter months. Option 2 is optimally sited with a south facing entry which capitalizes on the southern daylight <br /> and exposure in the winter months but would still allow the commons and the community spaces views of the lake and park to the east. The <br /> openness around the building provides greater opportunity in laying out the parking, building access and drop-off points. <br /> 40 SITE ANALYSIS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.