My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9.1. SR 06-20-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
06-20-2016
>
9.1. SR 06-20-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2016 2:55:55 PM
Creation date
6/15/2016 11:18:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/20/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 28, 2015 <br />Dear Mayor Dietz, Elk River City Council Members and Administrative Leaders, <br />In an ongoing manner the members of the Lake Orono Association, and its members in the Lake Orono Water <br />Quality Committee in particular, have had many discussions about the overall condition of Lake Orono. I am <br />submitting this letter of concern on their behalf. We believe the lake usability has been experiencing a lengthy <br />period of gradual decline, the consequences impacting both local quality of life and possible home values <br />decreasing as a result of the degraded conditions. <br />There are three distinct sets of background elements, timelines and patterns for our primary lake concerns: <br />Sedimentation: Lake Orono depth and sedimentation really first became a major concern in the late 1980s. <br />We took a couple of runs at building a coalition to address it, and a lake drawdown and sedimentation <br />removal was successfully completed in 1998. We projected at the time that it would need to be done again <br />in approximately 20 years, and that looks to be quite accurate. <br />Curly -leaf Pondweed: CLP became a major issue in 2001/2002 and we successfully navigated all the hoops <br />to get a permit to do a lake drawdown to freeze the CLP in late 2003. It worked well and we tried to get a <br />permit in 2004 to get the rest of it, but a resident complained that turtles were disrupted in 2003 so the <br />DNR rescinded their initial approval and said we should do it earlier in the year. From then on the rules <br />kept changing to get a drawdown permit. The CLP continues to get worse each year. In 2009/2010 we <br />successfully obtained 83% of all lakeshore owners signatures requesting a drawdown permit (by law 75% is <br />now needed) but the DNR turned us down saying in their opinion, "the problem wasn't bad enough." <br />Native Plant Overgrowth and Algae Proliferation: Both of these became major issues in 2010. No one is yet <br />quite sure why it started then, but it also started happening at the same time in other lakes around the <br />state. A couple of things that we believe contributed: in 2009 we had very light to no snow cover on the <br />lake so a greenhouse effect may have been created, and we had a couple of years of heavy rainfall and <br />runoff that "flushed" both nutrients and plant material down the Elk River and tributaries to Lake Orono. <br />We have reviewed the long-term plans of the city as well as the park and recreation plan. We see goals related <br />to water quality and assume the lake itself is at least a portion of those goals. We are interested in entering <br />discussions with appropriate city representatives to see if there are steps in these goals and actions where we <br />may be helpful and possibly give some input regarding our observations and concerns. Enclosed is a map <br />depicting the main concerns outlined above. <br />We have heard some exciting things relating to increasing water activities through the Parks and Recreation <br />Department, but we have also heard of discussions on whether this body of water should be viewed and <br />maintained as a lake or a river. That decision could have significant implications on long-term conditions and <br />uses. Left unchecked, the encroaching vegetation and sedimentation will render a significant portion of the lake <br />unusable for boats, canoes, kayaks, swimming, fishing, pontoon rides, or even our volunteer efforts to collect <br />lake samples for testing. <br />While we do not pretend to have answers to all the considerations necessary for this discussion, we do have <br />some significant longevity and experience on the lake as well as a desire to protect what we feel is a major <br />community asset. We are in a unique position to give first-hand history and have the ability to provide large- <br />scale monitoring of conditions as any potential action steps are implemented. <br />We would welcome an opportunity to meet with the parties involved in City long-term planning goals to help us <br />understand your thoughts and concerns regarding the future of Lake Orono as well as identifying any way that <br />we can be helpful. Please contact me either via email ekbury@charter.net or phone (763) 241-8887 to let us <br />know if any additional information is needed and when we could meet. <br />Sincerely, <br />Ed Bury, President <br />Lake Orono Improvement Association <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.