Laserfiche WebLink
771 <br /> %,,q111.""141 �- .has n Vfi <br /> This section provides the WHP manager an opportunity to briefly discuss implementation activities that have <br /> occurred since: 1) plan adoption, or 2) the last evaluation report. The major headings are intended as guideposts <br /> to discuss how the additional data collected or additional documentation has helped guide the management of the <br /> WHP plan based on the health risks that specific potential contaminant sources present to the public waster supply <br /> well(s). It would also be useful to discuss which activities or approaches have been successful and which have <br /> not. <br /> A. Discuss briefly, the results of any groundwater sampling or monitoring (that you <br /> are aware of) conducted in the DWSMA. Include results from your own well(s). <br /> Elk River Wells: The aquifer recharges every year. Static and pumping levels have been <br /> the same. Water quality has remained the same since WHP plan approval. No evidence <br /> of contamination, all results within SDWA guidelines. Well #5 recently sampled (May <br /> 10, 2016) for tritium, results are pending. <br /> There may be efforts ongoing by the Sherburne SWCD, but status is unknown. <br /> B. Discuss how the Potential Contaminant Source Inventory is kept current. What <br /> changes have taken place since Plan adoption or the last Evaluation? <br /> The PCSI is currently in PDF format in the plan, and the WHP plan manager has access <br /> to the excel spreadsheet. Data is/will be added as changes occur. <br /> C. Please list wellhead protection measures implemented since Plan adoption. Use <br /> the strategies and action portion of your WHP Management Plan as a guide. <br /> Measure 1 Measure 17 <br /> Measure 2 Measure 18 <br /> Measure 3 Measure 21 <br /> Measure 4 Measure 22 <br /> Measure 5 Measure 23 <br /> Measure 7 Measure 25 <br /> Measure 8 <br /> Measure 9 <br /> Measure 10 <br /> Measure 13 <br /> Measure <br /> 3 <br /> 61 <br />