My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.1. SR 06-06-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
06-06-2016
>
10.1. SR 06-06-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2016 2:01:09 PM
Creation date
6/3/2016 7:17:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/6/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ELK RIVER COMMUNITY CENTER <br /> CONCEPTUAL SOLUTIONS <br /> SITE OPTION 4: <br /> ORONO PARK <br /> Elk <br /> R iyLe-r` <br /> 8559 Gary StreL <br /> The Orono Park site offers a great multitude of opportunity for a potential new facility in many regards. Although it is not as <br /> centrally located as Lion's Park, it is largely accessible by vehilces and pedestrians alike, with access to Highway Ten from both Joplin Street <br /> and Gary Street. The site is located directly adjacent to Lake Orono and would have access to the park amenities currently in place at <br /> the beachside Orono Park, as well as future pedestrian access from the city's trail system. Access to the site will be more improved in the <br /> future when a new Highway Ten overpass is complete, better connecting the portions of the city south and north of the current highway. <br /> The Orono Park site also provides convenient proximity to other existing city owned community buildings including City Hall, The Library, <br /> Police/Fire Department, and the YMCA. Locating the facility here would continue to develop a 'campus' of city owned and ran community <br /> buildings. <br /> Perhaps the greatest advantage to this site is it's proximty to Orono Park and Lake Orono. This could be captured in the facility by taking <br /> advantage of the views eastward toward the lake and even including some outdoor spaces off the building (patios or gardens) that could tie <br /> the building to it's adjacent exterior community spaces. Both concept options 1 and 2 would provide views of the lake from the community <br /> and commons spaces. The sites flatness and expansiveness make it prime and ready for building construction which could save money on site <br /> development costs,as well as provide opportunities in the future for other development on or near the site (including open area to the south, <br /> and the existing county fairground property to the east). The existing openness on the site and adjacent fairgrounds could also save money <br /> upfront by allowing the potential for the new facility to use exsisting open space for large event parking. The fact that the site doesn't have <br /> a lot of existing constraints translates to multiple opportunities and options for orienting the facility. Option 1 explores the idea of aligning a <br /> main entry commons to be focused on the Lake as one enters the building. The negative to this is that it puts the largest and tallest volumes <br /> of the building (the ice spaces) on the south side of the building thus shading the entry during the winter months. Option 2 is optimally sited <br /> with a south facing entry wihch capitalizes on the southern daylight and exposure in the winter months but would still allow the commons <br /> and the community spaces views of the lake and park to the east. The openness around the building provides greater opportunity in laying <br /> out the parking, building access and drop-off points. <br /> Mr36 SITE ANALYSIS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.