My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES (2 SETS) 06-06-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
06-06-2016
>
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES (2 SETS) 06-06-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2016 4:34:30 PM
Creation date
6/2/2016 2:14:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/6/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 4 <br /> May 2,2016 <br /> ----------------------------- <br /> Brent Roberts, 19203 Lincoln Street- agreed with all the comments so far regarding <br /> the connection to the Sunset Ridge Development and the traffic study. He <br /> questioned the validity of the traffic study because he believes traffic has increased, <br /> not decreased as the study shows. <br /> Dave Green, 19110 Kennedy Street - stated he is not in favor of a connection to the <br /> Sunset Ridge Development and he doesn't understand why staff believes a <br /> connection will benefit anyone in Sunset Ridge. He likes the idea of a trail <br /> connection. <br /> Howard Johnson, 19184 Lincoln Street- agreed with everyone who spoke already. <br /> He is not in favor of a vehicular connection to Sunset Ridge because he believes the <br /> intersections are dangerous enough already. He would be in favor of a walking or <br /> bike path. <br /> Randy Barney, 19008 Lincoln Street- stated he is not in favor of a connection. He <br /> explained he believes another traffic study should be done in 15 or 30 minute <br /> increments to get an accurate picture of traffic during peak times. He added the <br /> roads are not well lit and additional traffic could cause issues for people walking at <br /> night. <br /> Pat Voltzke, 19172 Kennedy Street-indicated she doesn't understand how the <br /> Council can just change the zoning. She also expressed opposition for the project <br /> because she believes it will ruin the reason residents moved to the area. She added <br /> she would like to see the traffic study redone as well. <br /> There being no one else to speak to this issue,Mayor Dietz closed the public <br /> hearing. <br /> Mayor Dietz indicated it seems the only concern of the residents is the vehicular <br /> connection to the Sunset Ridge Development. He added taxes would not increase <br /> for repair of the roads as the Pavement Management Fund covers those expenses. <br /> He explained Twin Lakes Road is a county road and the city has no jurisdiction so all <br /> improvements would have to be initiated by Sherburne County. <br /> Councilmember Wagner reiterated Twin Lakes Road is a county road and the city <br /> doesn't have much control. She explained she is familiar with the traffic around the <br /> area as her children go to Twin Lakes School. She stated she spoke with the city <br /> engineer earlier to see about improving the site lines and he worked with the <br /> landowner and cleared many trees which helped. She noted a majority of the <br /> accidents are deer/car accidents. Councilmember Wagner stated she does have <br /> concerns with adding traffic on to Lincoln Street but wondered if the Sunset Ridge <br /> Development would benefit by an alternate access to Twin Lakes Road. She <br /> explained she understands resident concerns and is not disagreeing with anything <br /> stated but she questioned what the negatives are for not making the connection and <br /> wondered if they outweigh the benefits. <br /> UREJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.