My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.4. SR 11-22-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
11/22/2004 - SPECIAL
>
3.4. SR 11-22-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:00 AM
Creation date
11/18/2004 3:51:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2. TH 169 MN /DOT Environmental and Geometric Study <br />The City Council, sometime ago, asked MN/DOT to take the TH169 interregional corridor study to <br />the next step. MN/DOT has taken the city's request and expanded it to the point where they are <br />ready to embark on the study from the intersection ofTH169/TH10/TH101 north to Princeton. I <br />have recently spoken with Craig Robinson, MN/DOT's Project Manager for the TH169 <br />interregional corridor. He indicated to me that he was planning to get all parties together in <br />December to briefly discuss the parameters of the environmental and geometric study on the <br />highway prior to beginning the consultant selection process. Also, the Mayor and I sit on the Central <br />Minnesota Area Transportation Partnership and at the recent meeting on Friday, October 29, 2004, <br />we received information that indicates MN /DOT does not have any money programmed for <br />construction on TH169 through the year 2030. Obviously, planning items out this far are subject to <br />change, but I thought it might be worthwhile having the City Council discuss this issue again and <br />reaffirm the position that they would like to move forward on the environmental and geometric <br />study ofTH169. <br /> <br />3. County Road 40 (Cleveland Avenue) Turnback <br />Attached are the meeting minutes from the City/County engineering meeting held on Tuesday, <br />October 26, 2004. Also attached is the cost estimate for the reconstruction of CR40 with a <br />breakdown of participation from federal, county, and city funds. This was prepared in conjunction <br />with Dave Schwarting. At the October 26 meeting, at which the Administrators and two elected <br />officials from each party were present, it was the general consensus that the turnback and <br />reconstruction of CR40 should proceed. It would be appropriate for the entire City Council to <br />discuss this issue and consider providing a consensus of the Council to move forward with the <br />turnback and reconstruction of CR40. <br /> <br />4. Sherburne County Cost Participation Policy <br />If the City Council would like to discuss the County's cost participation policy, attached is a <br />spreadsheet that I prepared approximately a year ago that compares the Sherburne County policy to <br />those of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, and Wright County policies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.