My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2016 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2010 - 2019
>
2016
>
04-26-2016 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/25/2016 4:09:54 PM
Creation date
5/25/2016 4:09:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
4/26/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 <br /> April 26,2016 <br /> Berton Bongard,19040 Lincoln Street NW—asked that the Commission reconsider <br /> pushing traffic through the Sunset Ridge development, since there were already a lot of <br /> accidents at the County Road. <br /> Karl Voltzke, 19172 Kennedy Street NW—Asked when the road connections to the <br /> development would be made. Mr.Leeseberg explained. Mr.Voltzke asked how the road <br /> connections would be made when the applicant does not own the property in the"white <br /> area". He also questioned the type of traffic"study that was done,and the accuracy of the <br /> study.Mr.Leeseberg stated that an Annual Average Daily Traffic study was completed by <br /> MnDOT. <br /> Man Roessler,Paxmar—Addressed the conditions recommended by staff as follows: <br /> Conditional Use Permit <br /> • #3—remove language"and maintain all exterior building coverings." <br /> • #4—add"at the curb"after"20 foot driveway widths"and removed language"all <br /> parcels below 65 feet wide";add language"for the parcels on the west side of Edison <br /> Street." <br /> • #7—remove requirement for B618 curbing for lot sizes greater than 70 feet. <br /> • #11 —revise to require 2 trees per lot and 3 trees on comer lots. <br /> • #12
—insert"or builder"after"to be installed by developer". <br /> • #14—remove requirement that homeowners association be required to <br /> maintain the trails. <br /> • Snowplowing should not be an issue,since the street width is standard. <br /> Preliminary Plat <br /> • #3—remove"one foot wider than the front and sides of the building and 12"and <br /> add"20"after"shall be platted on a parcel" <br /> Don Jensen,Paxmar—stated that Paxmar now owns the"white area"(property) shown on <br /> the site plan,and they will go through the process of platting the property. He stated that <br /> the necessary connections required by staff will be provided. He stated that Paxmar does <br /> not need the connection to the west;this is a recommendation by staff. Mr.Jensen stated <br /> that they will provide a paved trail connection for residential access to services,as well as use <br /> by the general public,but questioned the recommendation for the HOA to maintain it. He <br /> stated that the trail to the south recommended by the Parks and Recreation may not be <br /> feasible due to the slopes,but that will need to be determined at some point in the future. <br /> Mr. Roessler discussed the access to the east,stating that it may not be possible depending <br /> upon the paving schedules in October. <br /> Mr.Jensen discussed the difference in product lines and impacts on where the driveway <br /> openings are located. He did not feel there would be a driveway"creep"issue and explained <br /> why. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.