My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.5. SR 05-16-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
05-16-2016
>
7.5. SR 05-16-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2016 1:53:58 PM
Creation date
5/13/2016 11:29:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/16/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Planning Department <br />F'rom: <br />'Justit) Fernritc, P.F'., City Eng; neer <br />Date: April 28, 2016 <br />Subjlect: Miske Meadows Traffic: Study Review <br />The engineering division has reviewed the Miske Meadows preliminary plat for traffic related <br />impacts. The proposed Miske Meadows development is a revised version of the formerly <br />proposed River park Development. Densities and uses Proposed arc in accordance with <br />what was, proposed to be done when the development was first studied as River Park. <br />Because densities and uses remain a constant, we reviewed the traffic impact report that was <br />completed in April 2004 and incorporated into the F'rivironmental Assessment's orksheet <br />for changed conditions that might raise other questions or concerlis. The main variable that <br />may cause change to the findings presented in the 2004 study would be a deviation from <br />anticipated traffic volumes on the primary adjacent roadways serving the development (Cali. <br />13, C-R 4(1). <br />The average daily traffic volumes, forecasted in the 2004 traffic impact report, have been <br />reviewed against the actual traffic volumes counted on the adjacent roadway system since <br />that time. A SUM11-1aly Of these volumes is attached. In this review, we would expect current <br />volumes to fall somewhere between the No Build and lull Build scenarios presented in the <br />2004 report. The actual volurries are consistent with what was forecasted in the study. <br />The 2004 traffic impact report discussed Cr possible mitigariori measures to be implemented <br />or monitored in order to handle the increase in traffic to the adjacent systems. Three of the <br />six mitigation measures recommended physical modifications to the area highway system at <br />the tit-ne of developtnent. All three of these have been completed. The remaining i-nitigatioll <br />measures suggested monitoring of the carrying capacity of the area highway systems. <br />Independent of the IMiske Meadows development, the city is currently Studying the traffic <br />levels and captions for improvement at the '11-1 169/CR 12 area as suggested in the study. <br />The county road system will continue to be evaluated in the futu.re as traffic levels rise to, the <br />point of needing to consider additional lane capacities. <br />F I W FFT F A V <br />N: \I )epa rt rnent Public Work�'\E,ngirwcring\S I NWROV I �MENT PRO-JI'M \2016 I yrpro% mo it <br />M"idows\4-28 16 '1 rnffic Rcvicw MCJ1V).d0CN NATURE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.