My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.14. SR 05-16-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
05-16-2016
>
4.14. SR 05-16-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2016 10:23:43 AM
Creation date
5/13/2016 8:33:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/16/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2010-14 <br />MEDIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT <br />THIS AGREEMENT is fully effective as of April 27, 2016, and is entered into by the <br />City of Elk River (City) and Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett. P.A. (Gray Plant), Charlie <br />Wilson and Peter Beek. Gray Plant, Mr. Wilson and Mr. Beck shall sometimes be collectively <br />referred to herein as "Defending Parties." The City and Defending Parties shall be collectively <br />referred to as "Parties." <br />RECITALS <br />Whereas, Defending Parties represented the City in connection with the 2006 purchase of <br />the golf course property identified as "Gutlot A and Gutlot B, Pinewood, according to the plat on <br />file in the office of the Regisrar of Titles in and for Sherburne County, Minnesota, FID NO 75- <br />504-0010 and 75-504-0020" (the "Property"). <br />Whereas, as part of its representation of the City, Defending Parties were involved in the <br />preparation of a purchase agreement, lease and contract for deed and related documents (the <br />"Documents") to allow for sale of the Property from Paul and Pamela Krause ("Krause") to the <br />City. <br />Whereas, the City contends that Defending Parties failed to provide legal services for <br />preparation of the Documents in accord with the required standard of care and alleged that <br />Defending Parties failed to prepare the Documents to comply with the statutory requirement <br />limiting the Krauses' remedies against the City upon default to recovery of the Property. <br />Whereas, the City contends it experienced damages as a result of the alleged errors on the <br />part of Defending Parties and was forced to pay damages to the Krauses related to the sale of the <br />Property. <br />Whereas, the Defending Parties denied liability and asserted that they provided all legal <br />services and prepared the Documents in accordance with the required standard of care. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.