My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.4. ERMUSR 05-10-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2016
>
05-10-2016
>
2.4. ERMUSR 05-10-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2016 9:13:31 AM
Creation date
5/10/2016 9:13:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
5/10/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In many cities, of course, those community-minded people who tend to get <br /> involved in city government are the same ones who tend to be willing to <br /> donate their time to a civic organization putting on a community festival. One <br /> problem is that it sometimes can get very difficult to determine on whose <br /> behalf the individual is acting at a particular time. <br /> One suggestion for dealing with this problem is for the city council simply to <br /> pass a resolution declaring the festival to be a city function and the <br /> organization putting it on to be city volunteers. The idea is that this is a way to <br /> bring the whole event under the city's liability coverage,but it's not that <br /> simple. <br /> From the standpoint of LMCIT coverage,the real question is whether this is, <br /> in fact, a city event or merely in the name. Certainly, a resolution declaring <br /> the council's intent would be one element in making that determination,but <br /> simply saying it doesn't make it so. Other factors to look at include: <br /> • How the decisions relating to the special event are actually made and by <br /> whom. <br /> • How and in whose name contracts are let. <br /> • How the funds are handled. If the money from the event is run through the <br /> city treasury and disbursed by city check with council approval, it looks <br /> more like a city operation. If another group has its own bank account in <br /> which it places and expends money, it doesn't really look like a city <br /> operation. <br /> Even with an event organized and run by a private group,the city will often <br /> have some sort of role. For example: <br /> • Thegroup may conduct some activities in a city park or use city streets. <br /> • City police may be involved in traffic or crowd control. <br /> • The city recreation department might be responsible for organizing some <br /> recreational activities as part of a festival organized by a community <br /> group. <br /> Where the city has this kind of involvement in a privately-sponsored event, <br /> the LMCIT coverage will apply to suits and claims against the city,the city's <br /> officers and employees, and the city's volunteers, if those claims arise out of <br /> acts on behalf of the city. <br /> LMCIT's Tenant User LMCIT would not provide any protection for the organization or the <br /> Liability Insurance Program <br /> (TULIP)provides access to individuals responsible for organizing a privately-sponsored event, even if <br /> low-cost liability coveragethose individuals or organizations were sued because of something the city <br /> for the city's"tenant users". <br /> did. If LMCIT ended up covering some city liability which arose out of some <br /> negligent action of the private group, LMCIT would very likely try to recover <br /> those damages from that group and/or the responsible individuals. <br /> 106 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.