My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1. SR 05-02-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
05-02-2016
>
7.1. SR 05-02-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2016 2:52:19 PM
Creation date
4/29/2016 3:09:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/2/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oty of <br /> Memorandum <br /> ElkRiV6' r <br /> To: Planning, Department <br /> roe m: <br /> 'Justit) l emrite, I'.la., C:sity l rag;itmecr <br /> Date: April 28, 2016 <br /> Subjlect: Miske Meadows Traffic: `study review <br /> The engineering division has reviewed the Miske Meadows preliminary plat for traffic related <br /> impacts. The proposed Miske Meadows development is a revised version of the formerly <br /> proposed River park Development.. Densities and uses proposed Erre in accordance with <br /> what was proposed to be done when the development was first studied as liver Park. <br /> Because densities and uses remain a constant,we reviewed the traffic impact report that was <br /> completed in April 2004 and incorporated into the I::nvironmental AssessmentWorksheet <br /> for changed conditions that might raise Cather questions or concerras. Thee amain variable that <br /> ramal' cause change to the findings presented in the 2004 study would be a deviation from <br /> anticipated traffic volumes on the primary adjacent roadways serving the development (Cali. <br /> 13, C-R 4(1). <br /> The average daily traffic volumes, forecasted in the 2004 traffic impact report, have been <br /> reviewed against the actual traffic volumes counted on the adjacent roadway system since <br /> that time. A sunamam�y of these volumes is attached. In this review, we would expect current <br /> volumes to fall somewhere between the No build and lull Build scenarios presented in the: <br /> 2004.report. The actual volurmes are consistent with what was forecasted in the study. <br /> The 2004 traffic impact report discussed Cr possible mnrtigatiorm measures to be implemented <br /> or monitored in carder to handle the increase in traffic to the adjacent systems. Three of the <br /> sig mitigation measures recommended physical modifications to the area highway system at <br /> the ti:rne of developtnent. All three of these have been completed. The remaining i-nitig;atiora <br /> measures suggested monitoring of the carrying;capacity of the area highway systems. <br /> Independent of the IMiske Meadows development, the city is currently Studying; the traffic <br /> levels and options for improvement at the '11-1 169/CR 12 area as suggested in the study. <br /> The county road system will continue to be evaluated in the future as traffic levels rise to the <br /> point of needing;to consider additional lane capacities. <br /> N:\I)epa rt rnent Public Workti'\ ^,nprwacricuf?\`+➢N1r'1tOVI' tti E f PRO-JI.l:f \2016 Iyrapro%moi I�xrjcctw �u I,d: rf �A <br /> h."idows\4?H-16'Irnffic Ri.vicw "kQ'Cr1xi.d0c.r' NATURE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.