My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.4. SR 11-08-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
11/08/2004
>
4.4. SR 11-08-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:59 AM
Creation date
11/5/2004 7:57:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/8/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I. <br />. <br />~ <br />, <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />.. <br />) <br />) <br />.. <br />.. <br />~ <br />~ <br />, <br />, <br />~ <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />:t <br />oct <br />~ <br />OJ <br /> <br />What it accomplishes: Keeps land in private ownership while establishing permanent, <br />legally binding protection for a site's narural features, to the degree thar such <br />protection is specified in the rerms of the easements <br />When it may be appropriate: <br />1) When a funding mechanism can be identified to finance the purchase of <br />easements <br />2) When the administering unit of government or nonprofit organization has <br />the staffing and administrative capabiliry to set up and oversee the program <br />on an ongoing basis <br />3) As an alternative for local protection of high prioriry natural areas when <br />a communiry does not have the financial resources to acquire fee simple <br />interest <br />4) When a local government unit prefers protection methods that compen- <br />sate landowners for restricted development, as opposed to limiting develop- <br />menr through zoning or other regulatory means <br /> <br />.......... <br /> <br />POR programs may be viewed as the systematic application of perpetual conserva- <br />tion easements used as a tool to protect communiry narural areas. The administer- <br />ing agency (ciry, counry, or state government agency, or nonprofit organization) <br />develops specific criteria used to seleer sites for which acquisition (purchase) of ease- <br />ments is sought. These criteria will vary according to the prioriry goals of the POR <br />program (e.g. protection of watersheds, wildlife habitat, or a highly valued feature <br />of the communiry such as a bluff). POR programs commonly operate with a "will- <br />ing seller" policy, in which local government units ,contact the owners of land con- <br />sidered high prioriry for protection and, depending on the landowner's interest, <br />negotiate mutually agreeable terms. Landowners who sell their development rights <br />as part of a POR program retain ownership of their propei-ry and all rights not <br />specifically assigned to the acquiring agency in the terms of the easement. Some <br />local governments fmance POR programs through issuance of bonds or through <br />special taXes assessed on properry. The ciry of Ounn in Dane Counry, WI (popula- <br />tion 5,540) initiated a POR program in 1996 to acquire development rights for pro- <br />tection of farmland~ open space, and natural areas. <br /> <br />As is the case with TOR programs, enabling legislation allowing cities, towns, and <br />counties to adopt POR programs has recently been approved in Minnesota (via <br />amendments to Chapters 394 and 462 of the Minnesota Statutes), making POR a <br />viable land use planning tool available to the state's local governments. For infor- <br />mation on POR programs and their status in Minnesota, contact the Land Steward- <br />ship Project (See Resources, p.98). <br /> <br />43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.