My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.7. SR 11-01-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
11/01/2004
>
6.7. SR 11-01-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:59 AM
Creation date
10/29/2004 9:33:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />$"",, lor _ <br />----- <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Pat Klaers, City Admin," r tor <br />November I, 2004 <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Consider labor Agreement Between the City and law <br />Enforcement Labor Services (local 321 )-Police Officers Union <br />Contract for 2005-06 <br /> <br />Representatives of the city and the police officers union (Law Enforcement Labor Services, <br />Inc. Local #231) have met to discuss the terms and conditions for the next union contract <br />with the city. Going into the meeting I felt the police officers should get slightly more than <br />what is typically provided in wages due to both internal and external concerns. From an <br />internal point of view, the city has recently provided mid-year 2004 wage adjustments for all <br />other city employees; and in order to keep relationships somewhat balanced a slightly larger <br />than the typical 3% increase seemed appropriate. In terms of external comparisons, the city <br />police officers have fallen behind where they have historically been in wages as it relates to <br />police officers in Ramsey and Anoka. <br /> <br />We only needed one bargaining/negotiation session to arrive at a proposal that union <br />representatives could present to the police officers, and subject to the police officers <br />approval, that I could present to the City Council. The police officer union has accepted the <br />attached proposal. <br /> <br />The proposal is very straightforward. The contract is for a two-year period. One highlight is <br />that the wage increase for 2005 is 5%, and this is, of course, more than the 3% that we <br />generally propose and support. Also, it should be noted that with item #5, sick leave, that <br />this is new language being added. We currently have language that calls for: <br /> <br />after 5 years of service, providing 15%-up to 144 hours of pay; and <br />after 15 years, providing 20%-up to 192 hours of pay. <br /> <br />This additional sick time provision deals with longer term employees that have been with the <br />city over 20 years. (If approved we also anticipate providing this additional benefit to non- <br /> <br />s: \Council\Pat\2004\ UruonOfficers.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.