My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. SR 11-01-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
11/01/2004
>
6.1. SR 11-01-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:58 AM
Creation date
10/29/2004 9:26:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Building Deficiencies: Conditions Test (Condition Deficiencies) - determining the <br />combination of defects or deficiencies of sufficient total significance to justify substantial <br />renovation or clearance. <br /> <br />On-Site evaluations - Evaluation of each building was made by reviewing <br />available information from city records and making interior and/or exterior <br />evaluations, as noted, sometimes limited to public spaces. Deficiencies in <br />structural elements, essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire <br />protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or <br />similar factors, were noted by the evaluator. Condition Deficiencies mayor may <br />not include Code Deficiencies as defined below. Energy code compliance was <br />not considered for the purposes of determining Condition Deficiencies. <br />Deficiencies were combined and summarized for each building in order to <br />determine their total significance. <br /> <br />Building Deficiencies: Code Test (Code Deficiencies) - determining technical conditions <br />that are not in compliance with current building code applicable to new buildings and the <br />cost to correct the deficiencies: <br /> <br />On-Site evaluations - Evaluation of each building was made by reviewing <br />available information from city records and making interior and/or exterior <br />evaluations, as noted, sometimes limited to public spaces. On-site evaluations <br />were completed using a standard checklist format. The standard checklist was <br />derived from several standard building code plan review checklists and was <br />intended to address the most common, easily identifiable code deficiencies. <br />Mechanical Engineers, Electrical Engineers, and Building Code Officials were <br />also consulted in the development of the checklist. <br /> <br />Deficiencies were generally grouped into the following categories (category <br />names are followed by its applicable building code): <br />o Building accessibility - Minnesota Accessibility Code <br />o. Building egress, building construction - Uniform Building Code <br />o Fire protection systems - Uniform Building Code <br />o Food service - Minnesota Food Code <br />o HV AC (heating, ventilating, and air conditioning) - Uniform <br />Mechanical Code <br />o Electrical systems - National Electric Code and Minnesota Energy <br />Code <br />o Energy code compliance - Minnesota Energy Code <br /> <br />For the purposes of determining the Code Test (Code Deficiencies), Energy code <br />compliance is relevant because its criteria affect the design of integral parts of a <br />majority ofa building's systems. The intent of these criteria is to provide a means <br />for assuring building durability, and permitting energy efficient operation <br />(7676.0100). The energy code addresses general building construction (all forms <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.