My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. SR 11-01-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
11/01/2004
>
6.1. SR 11-01-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:58 AM
Creation date
10/29/2004 9:26:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Based on the above requirements, the substandard determination of a particular <br />building is a two-step process; therefore, the findings of each step are independent of <br />each other and both steps must be satisfied in order for a building to be found <br />structurally substandard. It is not sufficient to conclude that a building is structurally <br />substandard solely because the Code Test is satisfied. It is theoretically possible for a <br />building to require extensive renovation in order to meet current building codes but <br />still not meet the main test of the Conditions Test. <br /> <br />Furthermore, deficiencies included in the Conditions Test mayor may not include <br />specific code deficiencies as listed in the Code Test. In many cases, specific building <br />code deficiencies may well contribute to the data which supports satisfying the <br />Conditions Test; conversely, it is certainly possible that identified hazards or other <br />deficiencies which could be included in the Conditions Test do not necessarily <br />constitute current building code deficiencies. By defmition, the nature of the two <br />steps is slightly different. The Conditions Test is more subjective, whereas the Code <br />Test is an objective test. Conditions Test deficiencies are less technical and not <br />necessarily measurable to the same extent of the code deficiencies in the Code Test. <br />To the end that technical, measurable building code deficiencies support the <br />satisfaction of the less technical Conditions Test, the following code requirements are <br />defined in terms that go beyond the technical requirements of the code and <br />demonstrate their relevance in terms of" . . . deficiencies in essential utilities and <br />facilities, light and ventilation, etc. . ." <br /> <br />Uniform Building Code ruBC): The purpose of the UBC is to provide minimum <br />standards to safeguard life or limb, health, property and public welfare by <br />regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and <br />occupancy, location and maintenance of all buildings and structures (UBC 101.2). <br />A deficiency in the building code (insufficient number of building exits, <br />insufficient door landing area, etc.) adversely affects one or more of the above <br />standards to safeguard 'life or limb. . .and public welfare'; therefore, a deficiency <br />in the building code is considered a deficiency in one or more "essential utilities <br />and facilities, light and ventilation, etc.". <br /> <br />Minnesota Accessibility Code. Chapter 1341: This chapter sets the requirements <br />for accessibility all building occupancies. The Minnesota Accessibility Code <br />closely follows the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines <br />(ADAAG), which sets the guidelines for accessibility to places of public <br />accommodations and commercial facilities as required by the Americans with <br />Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. The ADA is a federal anti-discrimination statute <br />designed to remove barriers that prevent qualified individuals with disabilities <br />from enjoying the same opportunities that are available to persons without <br />disabilities (ADA Handbook). Essentially, a deficiency in the accessibility code <br />(lack of handrail extension at stairs or ramp, lack of clearance at a toilet fixture, <br />etc.) results in a discrimination against disabled individuals; therefore, a <br />deficiency in the accessibility code is considered a deficiency in "essential <br />utilities and facilities". <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.