Laserfiche WebLink
2015 , .4. <br /> MOE <br /> Min <br /> POWER IN ADVOCACY •••o••• <br /> MI." <br /> NUM <br /> CLEAN POWER PLAN _ <br /> • The Clean Power Plan final rule that the EPA • Members of Congress introduced <br /> maxi MIME MINK . issued in 2015 contained many positive disapproval resolutions under the Congres- <br /> allal== •• changes from the proposed rule,and reflected sional Review Act to overturn the EPA's <br /> inTIN • some APPA recommendations.But it still tries rules. <br /> om_ . to do too much too fast in many states. <br /> • In response to the Federal Plan Require- <br /> : The final rule could create stranded costs and ments and Model Trading Rules that the <br /> • curtail the remaining useful life of electric EPA proposed to implement the Clean <br /> DISTRIBUTED . generating units.This could increase operating Power Plan,APPA said the EPA should <br /> costs,add new infrastructure costs,and raise adopt rate and mass based plans, <br /> GENERATION • electricity bills for millions of consumers. establish price and reliability safety valves, <br /> and other measures to make the plan <br /> APPA worked with congressional offices to : • APPA and the Utility Air Regulatory Group easier to comply with. <br /> • Emphasize that distributed generation : petitioned the U.S.Court of Appeals for the <br /> issues must be left to state and local • D.C.Circuit to review the EPA's Clean Power Public power utilities continue to <br /> • Plan final rule,and asked for a stay of the reduce greenhouse gas emissions <br /> decision making. : rule during review, through greater use of renewable,nuclear,and <br /> • Raise awareness about public power's • On Feb.9,2016 the Supreme Court granted other low-and non-emitting generation <br /> increasing distributed generation offerings. . motions filed by states and industry— sources,and increased energy efficiency and <br /> • Assert that federal interference with public • including APPA—to put the final rule on demand response programs. <br /> power decisions is unwarranted. . hold while the courts hear legal challenges. <br /> ICI BONDS <br /> • <br /> Municipal bonds have funded more than$1.9 trillion worth . <br /> of infrastructure construction in communities across America. • <br /> • <br /> APPA rallied to protect public power customers from : <br /> rate increases that would result from a change in tax-exempt • <br /> bond funding. . <br /> APPA joined forces with the Municipal Bonds for America Coalition in comments : HYDRO <br /> that warned against repealing or altering the tax exemption for municipal bonds. <br /> : LICENSING <br /> APPA supported the Obama Administration's proposals to simplify some federal tax laws relating . <br /> to municipal bonds and suggested further changes to make it easier for public power utilities to • A federal appeals court ruled that the <br /> invest. : municipal preference for hydroelec- <br /> • tric licensing under the Federal Power Act <br /> : does not have a geographic limitation.The <br /> • decision overturned FERC orders built on such <br /> . limitation.APPA supported affected members <br /> . litigating this case. <br /> 213 <br />