Laserfiche WebLink
Non-Flushable Wipes Bill Advances <br /> The bill to provide for the proper labeling of non-flushable wipes(SF 2525)received its second <br /> hearing on Wednesday, this time in the Senate Commerce Committee. The bill aims to <br /> address the problems and expenses that these wipes cause to municipal wastewater facilities <br /> when flushed. <br /> The bill author, Sen. Vicki Jensen (DFL-Owatonna) worked on an amendment with the <br /> MPCA, League of Minnesota Cities, MMUA and industry interests to clarify the definition of <br /> flushability and the labeling requirements. The amendment was adopted and the bill <br /> received unanimous support. SF 2525 was re-referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, <br /> because the legislation includes a penalty for violations of the labeling requirement. <br /> The progress of this bill is notable. Nationally, this is furthest that any legislation to require <br /> the labeling of non-flushable wipes has advanced through the legislative process. <br /> Regulatory Certainty Discussed in House Committee <br /> On Thursday, the House Environment and Natural Resources Committee discussed <br /> legislation to offer municipalities and industrial permit holders regulatory certainty if they <br /> choose to voluntarily install biological nutrient removal systems to reduce nitrogen levels in <br /> wastewater. <br /> HF 3409 is authored by Rep. Dan Fabian (R-Roseau) and is an initiative of the MPCA. The <br /> agency explained that many wastewater systems are currently in need of upgrades to meet <br /> the recently-adopted phosphorus standard, and a nitrogen standard will be coming down the <br /> pike in the future. If a city or industrial permit holder is building a facility to comply with <br /> the phosphorus standard, they could voluntarily choose to build for nitrogen (which is site- <br /> specific) and the MPCA would not give the permit holder a more stringent standard for <br /> nitrogen throughout the useful life of the equipment. <br /> Under the bill, the MPCA would determine whether or not to provide regulatory certainty <br /> before the permit is approved and the terms of the agreement would become part of the <br /> permit. Regulatory certainty would extend for the useful life of the system, up to 20 years. <br /> The MPCA stated this proposal would provide an environmental benefit by starting to remove <br /> nitrogen early, and provide a cost benefit to cities by building systems now when costs are <br /> cheaper. Plus, the Governor is proposing significant bonding support for municipal <br /> wastewater system upgrades such as these. <br /> The League of Minnesota Cities offered their support for the legislation. The Coalition of <br /> Greater Minnesota Cities expressed conceptual support,but wanted to continue working with <br /> the author to ensure that the EPA couldn't undo the regulatory certainty provided by the <br /> MPCA. MMUA has participated with limited legislative drafting assistance to MPCA and <br /> discussions with the other municipal organizations. <br /> The bill was laid over for possible inclusion in an omnibus. <br /> 224 <br />