My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-2016 CCM
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
03-21-2016 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2016 1:24:36 PM
Creation date
4/5/2016 1:20:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
3/21/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />March 21, 2016 <br />Mayor Dietz returned to the meeting, <br />7.7 Interim Use Permit for Extended Stay Hotel, Briggs Companies, <br />17423 Zane Street NW <br />Page 6 <br />Mr. Carlton presented the staff report. He noted the applicant is requesting a 5 -year <br />Interim Use Permit (lUP) for an extended stay hotel. He reviewed the history of this <br />property as noted in his presentation. He reviewed the definitions for hotels and <br />apartments and noted eight units have cooking facilities. He noted city ordinance <br />does not define extended stay hotels. He outlined the findings in ordinance that are <br />required to grant an IUP and discussed why Conditions #4 and #7 are not met by <br />the applicant. <br />Mayor Dietz opened the public hearing. There bring no one to speak to this issue, <br />Mayor Dietz closed the public hearing. <br />Councilmember Westgaard questioned the definition of hotel versus extended stay <br />hotel. He further questioned if there were differences from a building code <br />standpoint as to how cooking facilities are inspected. <br />Mr. Carlton stated city ordinance does not define an extended stay hotel. He stated <br />the building code would be the same for all cooking facilities He noted the biggest <br />changes required of this project, to convert to an apartment building, would be <br />accessibility requirements and radon mitigation. He discussed Minnesota <br />Department oilicaltli licensing requirements. <br />Councilmembet Westgaard noted hotels, extended stay hotels and apartments would <br />all have different electrical requirements for units with kitchens. For example, an <br />apartment would require its own electrical panel, whereas a hotel would not. He <br />questioned how the city could grant a conditional use or 'interim use permit when the <br />facility doesn't meet the requirements currently and the staff report states there <br />would be no modifications to the interior or exterior of the building. <br />Staff agreed with Councili-nember Westgaard's comments. <br />Mr. Carlton stated there are concerns with the building code in terms of the <br />definition of an extended stay hotel versus an apartment building. fie also <br />questioned when extended stay hotel become an apartment due to people bem*gm' <br />the facility longer term; what is the cutoff for the length of stay. <br />Mayor Dietz questioned why the applicant can't apply for apartment building zoning <br />for this parcel when itis his end goal. He stated the I UP allows the applicant to do <br />nothing. <br />Mr. Carlton, stated the IUP allows the applicant time to prepare his plans and <br />financing. <br />p a W f R I I 1 7 <br />N"AfURE] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.