6.5 PCSR 03-22-2016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Request for Action To Item Number Planning Commission 6.5 Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by Public Hearings March 22, 2016 Zack Carlton, Planning Manager Item Description Reviewed by Paxmar — Miske Meadows Chris Leeseberg, Senior Planner ■ Conditional Use Permit to Establish Planned Reviewed by Unit Development, Case No. CU 16-02 ■ Preliminary Plat for Miske Meadows (formerly River Park), Case No. P 16-02 Action Requested Recommend denial, by motion, the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request to establish a Planned Unit Development (PUD) named Miske Meadows for the following reasons: 1. The application does not satisfy requirement #8 for approval of a PUD. Recommend denial, by motion, the Preliminary Plat request for Miske Meadows for the following reason: 1. Without approval of the CUP, condition #1 for approval of a preliminary plat is not met. The Planning Commission may also recommend approval, or table the items to provide the applicant additional time to revise the proposal. Direction for desired revisions should be provided if the item is tabled. Background/Discussion Paxmar is proposing to continue development of the plat previously named River Park, which was first approved in 2004 with a mix of single-family lots and townhome lots for 4 and 8 units. The 2004 plat included 317 single-family homes, 173 townhomes, Twin Lakes Elementary School, and a city owned lot identified for use as a fire station. To date, 37 single-family and 32 townhome units (five buildings) have been constructed. Site Plan The road network and general configuration of the development is largely unchanged from the previous plat. However, the largest changes are seen in changes to lot/building types and sizes. The developer owns approximately 96 acres of the undeveloped portions of River Park. This area previously included 10 4 -unit townhome buildings (40 units) and 185 single-family lots (225 total). The current proposal includes 73 detached townhome units on lots ranging in size from 44 feet wide to 55 feet wide and 168 single-family lots between 65 feet and 75+ feet wide (241 total). The undeveloped areas not included in the current application are owned by Lennar. Access across the Lennar parcels is not proposed to change, and utility connections were previously stubbed in at the proposed road crossing locations. The connection (shown as 190th Ave) to County P I w E I E I I r Template Updated 4/14 ATURE