My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
EDSR MEMORANDUM 07-11-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
1993-2002
>
1994
>
07-11-1994
>
EDSR MEMORANDUM 07-11-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2016 10:11:07 AM
Creation date
3/4/2016 10:11:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
7/11/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EDA Agenda Memo Page 5 <br /> July 11, 1994 <br /> potential redevelopment projects in the CBD compete for a limited or <br /> 411 finite pool of funds. <br /> There is, however, a role that can be played by the City and its EDA or <br /> HRA. A proactive role is that of facilitating redevelopment. An <br /> EDA/HRA can be a conduit for redevelopment to occur. Examples <br /> include TIF grants or redevelopment grants, assembling land in <br /> anticipation of redevelopment, and finally, a willingness to absorb <br /> some redevelopment costs to ensure that investment in the CBD <br /> occurs. Another role is less proactive. It is the traditional regulatory <br /> role; that is, the traditional "police powers" of code enforcement, public <br /> safety, setbacks, and building code regulations. <br /> As the Steering Committee begins to explore Elk River's commercial <br /> sector, the writer of this memo believes that many opportunities exist <br /> for public sector participation. An opportunity exists for the <br /> City/EDA/HRA to commit itself towards absorbing certain <br /> redevelopment costs in future projects to ensure a vibrant CBD. This <br /> commitment must be long term and the financial pockets should be <br /> deep enough to ensure a long-term commitment. Of highest <br /> importance, is a recognition that public dollars that are not repaid or <br /> are left on the table as a result of a future redevelopment project <br /> • should not place a burden on the typical taxpayer. These are the <br /> challenges and the opportunities that will be discussed in greater <br /> detail at the EDA meeting. <br /> 10. MHFA Rental Rehab Program <br /> At a recent City Council meeting, a Twin Cities-based property <br /> manager introduced himself and reviewed with the Council two <br /> projects he had successfully undertaken in Minneapolis and in St. <br /> Louis Park. The individual has been working as property manager at <br /> the Lake Orono Estates apartments. He has indicated that this <br /> complex is no longer in receivership, and, the new owners are anxious <br /> to begin work on rehabing the apartments. <br /> A potential source of financing for a project like this is through the <br /> Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). MHFA offers a Home <br /> Rental Rehab Program which makes federal dollars, up to $14,000 per <br /> unit, available to apartment owners desiring assistance in rehabing <br /> their projects. This program covers 75 percent of the rehab costs. The <br /> balance of the costs are funded through owner's equity and/or other <br /> funds. The MHFA funds are typically provided as a zero percent loan <br /> • that is forgiven after five years. As a condition of this program, there <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.