My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.0. EDSR 03-13-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
1993-2002
>
1995
>
03-13-1995
>
8.0. EDSR 03-13-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2016 10:21:40 AM
Creation date
3/3/2016 10:21:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
3/13/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> 'o <br /> ai" <br /> C Action Alert ____ <br /> House bill would restrict TIF further <br /> Gary Carlson <br /> The House Property Tax and Tax <br /> Increment Financing Division will hear Summary of H F 147 <br /> H.F. 147 on.Wednesday March 8 at <br /> 8:00 a.m. The bill is authored by Reps. <br /> Ozment,Rest,Abrams and Winter. It The bill as proposed to be satisfactory). The State Auditor <br /> would place further restrictions on the amended by Representative would replace the Department of <br /> use of tax increment in cities through- Ozment would significantly restrict Revenues as the overseer of TIF <br /> out the state. Although the bill contains the permissible uses of tax incre- financed by capturing .1 percent(or <br /> several provisions that will affect future ment financing as well as add other about$230,000 from all increments <br /> projects,the bill would also place onerous reporting and approval statewide. County attorneys could <br /> restrictions on existing districts and requirements. sue to enforce the TIF law. <br /> require the decertification of all The major provision of the bill In another provision of the bill, <br /> districts as soon as existing commit- would strictly limit the use of tax school district approval would be <br /> ments are fulfilled. increment revenues in districts required for any tax increment <br /> The bill would require a more certified before May 1, 1990. district that is either initially planned <br /> stringent"but for"test,require school Under the bill,tax increment for housing or may eventually be <br /> approval for housing districts, limit the revel;ues would only be permitted used for housing. Even though the <br /> pooling of revenues and require to fulfill commitments currently in current school revenue formula <br /> decertification of existing districts as place.pay reasonable administra- would provide for additional <br /> .. <br /> soon as financial obligations and tive expenses or to make payments operating revenues for any new <br /> projects are completed. to school districts. For example, students located in a tax increment <br /> The League summarized the tax increment revenues could only district,the concern apparently <br /> provisions in H.F. 147 in the February be used to pay outstanding bonds surrounds the capital needs of <br /> 3 edition of the Cities Bulletin. that are secured by tax increment school districts that may be stressed <br /> Although Rep.Ozment will offer a revenues and that were issued by additional students. <br /> "delete-all"replacement for the bill,the before February 1, 1995 or to The bill would expand the <br /> general restrictions will not change. A satisfy formal commitments, annual tax increment reporting <br /> summary of the"delete-all"is to the agreements,or contracts entered requirements to include a descrip- <br /> right. into by February 1, 1995. tion of the activities that have <br /> Call your legislator and let them In addition,the bill would occurred within the district during <br /> know how these changes will impact require the authority to decertify the previous year as well as addi- <br /> your city. If you have specific projects the district when all outstanding tional information on the use of the <br /> that will be affected by the provisions, bonds ha.a been paid or defeased tax increment revenues, including a <br /> highlight these impacts. and all contractual obligations have n•;rrative of activities or improve- <br /> 1) The retroactive provisions been satisfied or are otherwise ments outside the district. Probably <br /> unfairly affect projects and broader covered by escrowed funds. the most difficult provision would <br /> area development efforts currently in The bill tightens up the"but be to write this narrative in"plain <br /> progress. for"test by requiring a finding that and simple language"that would be <br /> 2) The bill will add further the use of TIF will discourage easily understandable to a person <br /> restrictions to TIF that will adversely businesses from moving to another not familiar with tax increment <br /> impact Minnesota cities,especially state(the intent is to limit city vs. financing. <br /> where competing against other states city development conte"ts). Soil The League has a copy of the <br /> for jobs and economic development. ( districts would be limited to section by section of H.F. 147 and <br /> If you have any questions about polluted lands(topography and the delete-all bill. Contact Joel <br /> this bill,call Gary Carlson or Joel terrain alone would no longer be Jamnik.N—R <br /> Jamnik at the League or Vern Peterson <br /> at AMM. <br /> March 3, 1995 Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.