My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
EDSR MEMORANDUM 06-02-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
1993-2002
>
1997
>
06-02-1997 SPECIAL
>
EDSR MEMORANDUM 06-02-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2016 9:36:31 AM
Creation date
3/1/2016 9:36:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
6/2/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• demolition <br /> • relocation <br /> III. Primary Issues to Consider <br /> Staff outlines the following issues for consideration: <br /> • What are the qualifications of a redevelopment tax <br /> increment district? <br /> In order to qualify as a redevelopment tax increment financing district, <br /> the following requirements need to be met on the site: <br /> • At least 70% of the area of a district has to be improved <br /> • More than 50% of the building have to be structurally sub- <br /> standard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or <br /> clearance <br /> • At least 90% of the increment must be used to finance the <br /> cost of correcting conditions that allow designation of a <br /> redevelopment district <br /> It is important to remember that the state now requires cities utilizing <br /> tax increment to pay a penalty in a form of a reduction of local <br /> • government aid or an election for the city to provide a local matching <br /> requirement of 5% of the total tax increment generated. <br /> • What level of tax increment assistance would be provided to <br /> the developer? <br /> Staff has been very clear with the developer regarding the issue that <br /> tax increment will not be provided for this project in order to improve <br /> its competitive position over other similar commercial projects which <br /> have recently been completed. The developer has indicated its <br /> understanding of this issue and has stated that it can show <br /> extraordinary costs which place this project in a poor competitive <br /> position with other similar projects. If the EDA is in favor of providing <br /> tax increment assistance, staff would work with the developer to <br /> identify costs for which tax increment assistance would be requested to <br /> fund. The developer's request would then be examined by the EDA to <br /> determine whether it would be appropriately funded through tax <br /> increment assistance. <br /> It is important to note that it is likely some of the extraordinary costs <br /> identified by the developer would not be eligible TIF activities. <br /> Therefore, the likely scenario would be that the EDA would determine <br /> s:\e da\meetings\agmm602.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.