My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.0. EDSR 08-14-2000
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
1993-2002
>
2000
>
08-14-2000
>
6.0. EDSR 08-14-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2016 3:04:58 PM
Creation date
2/18/2016 3:04:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
8/14/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W. ADMINISTRATION OF DISTRICT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE TAX INCREMENT <br /> iACCOUNT <br /> Administration of District No. 21 will be handled by the City. The tax increment received as a <br /> result of increases in the tax capacity of District No. 21 will be maintained in a special fund <br /> separate from all other municipal funds and expended only upon sanctioned municipal activities <br /> identified in the tax increment financing plan. <br /> X. FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS <br /> Pursuant to the applicable sections of Minnesota Statutes, the City will report on TIF District No. <br /> 21. <br /> Y. MUNICIPAL APPROVAL <br /> The City of Elk River hereby makes the following findings: <br /> 1. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing District No. 21 is an economic development <br /> district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 12. <br /> District No. 21 consists of one parcel of property. The District is in the public interest <br /> because it will result in increased employment in the State, and it will result in preservation <br /> and enhancement of the tax base of the State. <br /> 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not <br /> occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that <br /> the increased market value of the site that could reasonable be expected to occur without <br /> the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value <br /> estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of <br /> the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of District No. 21 permitted by the <br /> Tax Increment Financing Plan. <br /> Due to the high cost of development on the parcel, and the cost of financing the proposed <br /> improvements, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment <br /> financing. <br /> A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of <br /> Tax Increment Financing District No. 21 and the use of tax increments has been performed <br /> and is presented below. <br /> 110 <br /> Tax Increment Financing District No.21 Page II-10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.