My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.0.EDSR 07-09-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
1993-2002
>
2001
>
07-09-2001
>
8.0.EDSR 07-09-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2016 3:23:10 PM
Creation date
2/17/2016 3:23:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
7/9/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Introduction <br /> • <br /> Introduction <br /> The Northstar Corridor Major <br /> Investment Study <br /> The purpose of the Northstar Corridor Major metropolitan planning organizations (the <br /> Investment Study and Environmental Impact Metropolitan Council in the Twin Cities <br /> Statement is to evaluate the future transporta- and the St. Cloud Area Planning <br /> tion needs of the corridor. Organization) have consequently focused <br /> on preserving and managing existing facili- <br /> Over the past fifteen years, the communities ties,with limited added capacity projects. <br /> in the Northstar Corridor have experienced <br /> substantial population and economic growth. The Major Investment Study addressed a <br /> Along with this growth has come limited wide range of possible transportation solu- <br /> highway expansion,increased automobile tions to these problems including improve- <br /> ownership, and more auto trips. Increased ments to roadways and bridges, commuter <br /> • congestion and the rail service,feeder bus <br /> reduced ability to easily improvements, system <br /> travel to key destinations management tech- <br /> gn _ it niques and no changes <br /> will be a significant deter- <br /> rent to the continued I �l 40.* 11.. f, beyond those already <br /> growth of the area. - �� . < �' programmed. <br /> •Growth in peak period F� To evaluate these alter- <br /> : s i ,i <br /> vehicle miles traveled over ~: natives, several studies <br /> the last decade,particular- 4were prepared includ- <br /> ly in the Twin Cities area, ing forecasts of land <br /> has strained the ability of development under the <br /> existing facilities to accommodate the commuter rail option, rail station designs, a <br /> demand. Both metropolitan areas - the Twin financial plan and an implementation plan. <br /> Cities and St. Cloud — recognize the need An environmental impact statement was pre <br /> to provide efficient transportation facilities to pared for the commuter rail/feeder bus <br /> accommodate the expected growth in a sus- option. <br /> tainable manner,while preserving the mobili- <br /> ty which makes such growth possible. These Station Neighborhood Development <br /> However,both metropolitan areas are increas- Principles and Guidelines are another of the <br /> • ingly constrained in their financial ability to special studies conducted, to support the <br /> provide new transportation facilities for peo- Major Investment Study. <br /> ple and goods. Mn/DOT and the two <br /> Station Neighborhood Development Guidelines 1 Northstar Corridor Development Authority <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.