Laserfiche WebLink
November 21 Task Force Meeting <br /> • November 14,2002 <br /> Page 4 <br /> • The Plan can acknowledge the potential need for an east/west corridor and set a framework that <br /> promotes the best route for Elk River. <br /> • The Plan determines that such a road is not in the best interests of Elk River and seeks ways to <br /> discourage the upgrading of County Roads to serve as such a corridor. This approach may not be <br /> able to limit improve outside of Elk River and the amount of traffic that flow into the city. <br /> • The Plan is silent on the issue. Planning occurs based on current usage of the roads. <br /> Gravel Mining District <br /> The City Engineer has concluded that the technical capacity exists to provide sewer and water service to <br /> the gravel mining district. A trunk line can be built to collect and transport wastewater from development <br /> to the wastewater treatment plant. The feasibility of these improvements will be driven by financial <br /> considerations. The trunk lines must pass through existing unsewered residential neighborhoods along <br /> Highway 169. Extending utilities without providing service creates financial gaps. The improvement costs <br /> are not proportionate to the benefiting properties and the ability to collect revenues. <br /> This situation brings community development and financial issues together in the southern sections of the <br /> District. Regardless of who pays for the improvements (the city or developers), the form and timing of <br /> development creates the revenue needed to pay for the improvements. These factors need to be considered <br /> as the Task Force plans for development in the District. <br /> This area provides a good example of an underlying challenge of planning. How does planning balance the <br /> desires of the community with the desires of the property owner? The charge of the Task Force is to view <br /> • this development from the community perspective. The objective is to guide development in a manner that <br /> best serves the community with recognition that the plans must be feasible. As we design specific <br /> development concepts for the southern sections of the District, we will explore potential combinations of <br /> retail, industrial and residential development. <br /> East Elk River <br /> All factors point to the eastern section of Elk River as the primary residential growth corridor. Potential <br /> development sites are within the Urban Service District and the city's utility system is designed to expand <br /> in this direction. Development groups are acquiring property to prepare for future growth. <br /> Street System <br /> The capacity of the street system to support future development is one of the most important factors to <br /> consider in planning for the future of east Elk River. In broad terms,the street system needs to achieve the <br /> following objectives: <br /> • Primary transportation routes (collectors and arterials) need to connect neighborhoods with the <br /> regional transportation system. At the present time, the regional system means Highways 169 and <br /> 10. These connections provide residents with access to employment and other activities outside of <br /> Elk River. <br /> • A set of primary routes also needs to facilitate movement within Elk River. The street system must <br /> provide routes for people to travel from their neighborhoods to shopping, schools and other <br /> facilities in Elk River. <br /> • Local streets are provided to provide access to individual neighborhoods. <br /> • If a city does not plan for a street system that meet each of these needs, then traffic shifts to undesired <br /> locations. In many respects traffic is like a river. When the flow of the river exceeds the capacity of the <br />