My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.0. EDSR 2-11-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
1993-2002
>
2002
>
02-11-2002
>
7.0. EDSR 2-11-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2016 2:57:28 PM
Creation date
2/16/2016 2:57:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
2/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- ; ,\.•vAlt„ z:;,f,t44. ' s ,: rtiteoi, phi:Innen , <br /> - Underemployment by Education—Overqualified or overeducated for <br /> " '" one's current employment <br /> Underemployment by education was analyzed using the self-reported <br /> education level and current occupation of the household respondents 25 <br /> years of age and older in conjunction with the Department of Labor's <br /> O*Net Job Zones. The respondent's current occupation was associated <br /> with the appropriate Job Zone and then compared to the self-reported <br /> education level. If the respondent's education level was higher than <br /> ''' '''‘`,47:-Attv'I' ‘'* 1:::, * ‘, required by the Job Zone associated with the occupation, the respondent <br /> was considered underemployed. For more information about the O*Net <br /> 3.1 Database see: http://www.onetcenter.orq/database.html <br /> git <br /> Underemployment by Wage— Employed at earnings below one's market <br /> value <br /> Underemployment by wage was analyzed using the household <br /> a,,; respondents' self-reported wage and occupation. This was then <br /> compared to the Second Quarter 2001 Minnesota Salary Survey <br /> • \ �� hftp://www.mNWorkForceCenter.orq/Imi/salary wage statistics for the <br /> corresponding region. Job tenure and job turnover' were taken into <br /> consideration and compared by individual occupation with the 10th 25th, <br /> 1 75th, and 90th percentiles in the Minnesota Salary Survey. If the <br /> ''''-,'1 1:4 respondent's reported wage was lower than the expected wage in the <br /> ' Minnesota Salary Survey then the respondent was considered <br /> underemployed. Farmers were not included in this analysis because <br /> ' farmers'wages are more correlated to land productivity than to job tenure. <br /> Reported job tenure (years in current job)was assigned to two <br /> • m4corresponding wage percentiles from the Minnesota Salary Survey. The <br /> occupational turnover rates were divided equally into four different groups <br /> —Very Low, Low, High, and Very High. <br /> Very Low Low High Very High <br /> ',"'t Turnover Turnover Turnover Turnover <br /> :'' \ Salary Job Job Job Job <br /> • %, Surve Tenure Tenure Tenure Tenure <br /> -f::' ''::• .<.z:,„Z'If• -, 1.','!--,- 4`,Ii;ittl*, 10-25% 0-5Years 0-4Years 0-3Years 0-2Years <br /> k,t;.,-°,,flisi,• ‘,/, <br /> ; -, 25-50% 5- 10 Years 4-8Years 3-6Years 2-4Years <br /> 50-75% 10-20 Years 8- 16 Years 6 - 12 Years 4-8 Years <br /> \..` 75% + 20 Years or More 16 Years or More 12 Years or More 8 Years or More <br /> Turnover rates were calculated using the Current Population Survey's Job Tenure Supplement <br /> microdata,produced by the U.S.Census Bureau. <br /> \- <br /> s <br /> 2001 Labor Force Assessment—Sherburne County 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.